The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. MER-C 08:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Darry Ring[edit]

Darry Ring (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company (WP:NCORP). References don't establish notability given they are promotional/advertorials: (1) the Forbes article establishes the owners as entrepreneurs. The company is mentioned in passing. (2) this reads like a press release, (3) is about a singer's wedding (where the ring is mentioned) - probable promo, (4) might pass as editorial, however the use of provided picture material is suspicious, (5) promo, (6) re-reporting the Forbes article. Really just mention in passing, (7) seems self-edited, (8) advertorial. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 19:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 19:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 19:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 19:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.