The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:08, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Davina Rose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Again? A WWE Contract doesn't make a wrestler notable. Too soon to create an article, she doesn't make any notable at the moment. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:20, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This so stupid. If you're going by that rule then you need to delete more than have of the NXT rosters wikipedia page & some people on the main roster. & Who are you to deceide if a person is notable enough. If you are signed by WWE & have actually appeared on one of their shows that should be enough notice. DJ8946 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:33, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You don't understand me. What's the notability in the article? Sign a contrcact with WWE and send to the farm territory. Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andre Tyson and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachelle Walker isn't notable because she hasn't do nothing yet. Who I am? An user with more of 5 years in Wikipedia. Davina Rose is training and appears in a show of a Indy promotion, nor even WWE because NXT it's a different promotion. If we stand Chris Hero, PAC, Brodie Lee or El generico in NXT it's because they are notbales (years in the business, a lot of matches, travel around the world) others like The Usos, Ted DiBiase or Brodus Clay are notbales because they spent years of his live in WWE main roster, no two moths in WWE farm territory. If you want to defend de article, show sources saying that Davine Rose is notable. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.profightdb.com/wrestlers/davina-rose-8206.html Check that out. Not only has she competed for the top independent womens wrestling promotion she has faced some of the top indy female wrestlers. --DJ8946 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

She wrestled a few matches, but no notable. In Cagematch and Profight, we can find a lot of wrestlers that had a match in indy promotions, but they haven't an article. Look at 11th Anniversary Show, no one of the first match have an article and they wrestled in a ROH iPPV. One match don't make you notable. Even Madison Eagles, Shimmer Champion, hasn't an article. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 18:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Being listed on a site that aims to list every wrestler who has stepped in the ring doesn't establish notability. Notability also doesn't come from being in the ring with a notable wrestler. If that were true, we'd have articles for every jobber ever squashed. Check out Rick Renslow's opponents. Biggest stars in the world, broadcast globally to millions. Where's his article? InedibleHulk (talk) 20:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Articles like this make me mad we can't just speedy them. . Feedback ^☎ 06:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wrestling notable people does not make you notable.LordMaldad2000 (talk) 18:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete For the same reasons identified above. Kabirat (talk) 09:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.