The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Day at the Fair[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the page appears to be a combination of fancruft and original research. There's no evidence that the band is notable. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per above and also it is quite unsourced which suggests it is not notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by CreativeNorth (talk • contribs) 20:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. No sources. No merge target. --Lockley (talk) 21:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The last two votes should be ignored as it does have an existing reliable source; a staff written bio in AllMusic which the nominator did not bother to mention, and it seems the two voters did no more than glance at the article, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:53, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unsourced material, not notable Alex-h (talk) 09:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.