The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 04:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deb Sofield

[edit]
Deb Sofield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a person that lacks the significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. She has some local awards and some coverage in community press but that is insufficient for inclusion as an article. Whpq (talk) 18:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:31, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the editing and the scrutiny--it's all part of the process. Obviously, I am a novice here. I have been using this article/entry to learn. I do, however,contend that Deb Sofield is worthy of an entry in Wikipedia and should not be deleted. YearginD (talk) 15:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.