The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Product articles are a challenging area as there are some fields where Wikipedia does have articles for different models or series of models and many other subject areas where it doesn't. That said, there is a consensus here to Delete but if the page creator wishes to work on their article in Draft space, incorporating the reviews that have been tracked down and submit it for review to AFC, let me know. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:41, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dell Chromebook 3100 2-in-1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in reliable sources. BEFORE search fails to find RS. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 16:33, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 16:33, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that there is significant coverage. If you follow that link it says that significant coverage is "addressing the topic directly and in detail," of which the article does both. The article has a brief introduction to the computer so that you can understand why it was made and for who it was made. The article then went into detail about quite a few of the specs of the computer. If we look at the other General notability guideline you can see that the article does not presume anything, everything that it says is a fact. The source provided while not being a published source, since you won't find a published source about this topic, is very reliable, as well as covers everything in the article. To end the General Notability Guidelines the source meets the criteria of being Independent of the Subject. Therefore there is no case to delete this article.Annox05 (talk) 17:06, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Annox05[reply]

"I believe that there is significant coverage. If you follow that link it says that significant coverage is "addressing the topic directly and in detail," of which the article does both." you are misunderstanding. Significant coverage applies to sources. Not the article itself. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not notable whatsoever. Only source in the article is simply a product information page allowing you to buy it, and all the sources I find are either for buying the product itself or for buying products related to the device. Annox seems to have a severe misunderstanding of WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:12, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I see they've been blocked a few times, happy to point them to articles explaining what we require for GNG. Let's all build a better mousetrap called wiki together! Oaktree b (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Blocked once. Then the admin who blocked me refused to unblock me even though I did everything that he had asked months before and another admin had to come in and unblock me since the original guy refused to do it. Annox05 (talk) 01:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete "best laptop under 500 bucks" and similar articles, mostly fluff. Oaktree b (talk) 20:48, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment There exist reviews of the laptop [1], [2], and [3]. These seem reliable. --((u|Mark viking)) {Talk} 12:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't think reviews contribute to notability. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  As secondary, and as far as I can tell, independent sources, I think they contribute to notability. In particular, WP:BOOKCRIT includes independent book reviews as one class of reliable sources for books. While we don't have an SNG for hardware, I think the same reasoning applies to hardware reviews for hardware. --((u|Mark viking)) {Talk} 18:36, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Clearly not notable and is more or less just fluff. We don't create pages for every model of laptop. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:46, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.