The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:55, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Von Gruning

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article makes a lot of claims why this person should be notable but when trying to follow up on them, I cannot find a single reliable source that talks about her at all. Fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG.

I'm also nominating

which is the subject's company and about which I can find as little coverage as I can find about her. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. So Why 09:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:51, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:51, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:51, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:55, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both articles on account of subjects failing WP:NBIO & WP:NCREATIVE and respectively WP:NCORP & even WP:GNG. -The Gnome (talk) 12:30, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. These are both highly advertorialized, not encyclopedic, in tone, and neither of them is referenced to any evidence of reliable source coverage — the referencing is a mix of primary and unreliable sources that don't support notability at all, not media coverage about her or the company for the purposes of satisfying WP:GNG, WP:CORP or our notability standards for fashion designers. Bearcat (talk) 17:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- WP:ENT per above, and adding that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:31, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.