The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was G3 as blatant hoax. The two photos in it were clearly identifed as a completely different breed. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:45, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dingo_Arabian_(Dog) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This dog breed does not appear to have any reliable sources written about it or to meet the general notability guidelines required for inclusion as a stand-alone article. Much of the material written here by the author is false. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 19:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - the article smacks more of advertisement than article, and it doesn't appear to be legit, anyhow. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking of listing this one, i thought it would of been fake.. --Darthvadar92 (talk) 19:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.