The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Divided region (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list has no effective inclusion criteria (and some entries that don't even seem to match what is already there), being a completely arbitrary grab bag of completely unrelated entities and situations. The title itself is inherently vague, with "region" able to mean whatever a reader/editor wants it to. I don't see how this could become an encyclopaedic topic. As it is it's entirely whatever an editor feels is appropriate, and any possible criteria from the existing title would be so expansive as to be utterly unworkable. It's a classic WP:Original Research type list, and it's also completely unsourced. CMD (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CMD (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.