The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkativerata (talk) 20:23, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Drops from the Kingdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self published book from an author with no article (who appears to be the author of the article). No references, no coverage from independent reliable sources. Contested PROD. MikeWazowski (talk) 12:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete While a self-published book could in theory still be notable,the lack of independent sources shows this is not. Edward321 (talk) 13:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There is no automatic notability for self published books. No references were provided to show that the book satisfies notability. Edison (talk) 15:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all the above. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.