The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Earth Water[edit]

Earth Water (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability for a company that seems to have had an article for a while yet garnered no reliable sources. Looks like just another bottled water company, albeit it one with a philanthropic heart. Regrettably philanthropy doesn't get you notability on Wikipedia. Would have been a potential candidate for speedy deletion but there have been many editors in its life. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   19:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• NoteThe references for the philanthropy are all dead and the company makes no mention of such beneficence on its web-site. I think that it is fair to assume that this was a marketing ploy - perhaps to gain notability here.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   15:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- unsourced original research. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:10, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Wikipedia is neither a marketing nor an advocacy platform. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.