The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources have been provided and judging by the sources I'd say notability is there by a bare minimum, (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Easter (film)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article that clearly does not meet WP:GNG. An internet search only reveals database entries and virtually nothing else. None of the information in "Production" or "Filming Locations" is verifiable at all. Created by a WP:SPI in relation to the film and its actors, probably someone who was involved in its production. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 02:56, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm finding some coverage for the stage play ([1]) and I found this film review. We might be able to justify an article for the stage play that contains information about the film, I think. (The play doesn't have an article.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:18, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Found this as well: [2] Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tokyogirl79: Do you think that those two sources on the film are enough to justify an article on the film? I like your idea for making one about the play though and merging this into that. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 22:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Personally? Not really. It could probably pass the bare minimum, but it'd be much more beneficial to have one article on the play itself and mention the film in that article since that'd be a stronger keep on that end since we'd at least have three sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:36, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:36, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ALTS:

year:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

music:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

location:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

actor:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

awards:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

recognition:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Temporary keep for now per just meeting WP:NF. IE: Articles and reviews and information verifiable in Variety, Grand Island Independent, Indiewire, HBO, Indie Promos, archive of official website, Film in America. And as there is far more available on the play, I am absolutely fine with it being merged into a future article on the Will Scheffer stage play by the same name if or when that article is written. Until then. it can stand alone. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 17:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It has sources,needs expansion46.208.73.116 (talk) 21:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.