The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elastic Games[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game company who have yet to produce anything. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:21, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually they were notable back in 2012 for going to develop a game called Police Warfare and are now notable for developing Last Year. It is going to come out this November. Don't make James Wearing mad he gave me all the info about everything and he was really happy about it so how about I give you his email and you take up its Non-notable with him as all the members on his team are notable they worked on all kinds of games. And Canada Media Fund and Epic Games donated to them for Last Year so why would they donate if there a Non-notable game company. And there game is due for November 2016. So how about you tell me why it's Non-notable and il send that to James Wearing and then he will probably write something about this to. So I don't get why you say Non-notable thousands of people donated to to the Kickstarter campaign and Canada Media Fund and Epic Games the makers of Unreal Engine even donated to them so why would they do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheHistoryKnower (talk • contribs) 16:21, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It is obviously way too soon to have an article about this company. Notability is established if the company gained significant coverage from secondary reliable sources. However, most sources seem to only focus on their upcoming game, Last Year, instead of the company itself. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I have still found nothing better, the company is only newly started within the past few years and there's nothing at all to at least insinuate this has become better noticed and can be minimally independently notable from its own games. SwisterTwister talk 05:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable, much WP:TOOSOON. Tom29739 ^[talk] 19:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, classical case of WP:TOOSOON. Cavarrone 05:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.