The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles 11:36, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elisa Isoardi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-term unsourced BLP of questionable notability. The Wordsmith^Communicate 07:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment There do appear to be enough sources available to address concers with sourcing,[1][2] and we might consider that notability to Italy should be good enough for en.Wikipedia. It would be good to get input from Italian Wikipedians. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 10:38, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Many sources, I was able add some in no time, there are many more. Clearly popular in Italy. Also quite attractive, if I may add. :-) --Milowent • ^talkblp-r 14:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per Milowent.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:44, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Invalid Nomination: I question whether the nominator has made a good-faith attempt to confirm that sources don't exist, as required by point 9 in WP:BEFORE. Hallucegenia (talk) 14:02, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Milowent's use of WP:AFTER and understanding of WP:ATD. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.