The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 14:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Dwomoh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Creation of a blocked sockpuppet who created dozens of pageant contestant stubs, nearly all of which fail WP:BIO/WP:NMODEL (this article included). See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Guthrie for a group nomination of several others. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Unlike most of the others, whose notability stems predominantly from US state pageant titles and national competition, Dwomoh holds a Miss Earth Belgium title. I nominated on the basis of not finding sources sufficient to pass WP:NMODEL or WP:BIO, but it occurs to me there may be a guideline about specific titles/competitions I haven't found. Perfectly willing to speedy keep pending identification of such precedent. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 03:14, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Delete per nom - Most were created by a sock/SPA who appeared to be affiliated with these pagent contests, Anyway no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 04:54, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete just like the rest that need to be deleted. Fails WP:NMODEL Any precedent (as has been cited elsewhere) only exists because the same paid sock farm was so aggressive in creating all these silly articles. Apply policy - they fail. Legacypac (talk) 06:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Not notable outside of one event --Hirolovesswords (talk) 02:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.