The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Passes WP:MUSICBIO#5 (non-admin closure) -Nahal^(T) 19:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Blue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources are from mostly non notable publications and a lot of the article is unsourced. Andise1 (talk) 16:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment undecided for now. Two sources fulfill GNG requirements: [1], [2]. Many other sources like Atwood are non-professional and probably unreliable. However, nom's reasoning is flawed: WP:BLP states that deletion of largely unsourced articles is only the last resort, but there is no indication of this. – UnnamedUser (talk; contribs) 01:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC) (this user was indefinitely blocked on 18 January 2020)[reply]
• Keep The subject meets WP:MUSICBIO#5 "Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels", with two albums on Audiotree, as clearly stated in the article. The state of sourcing in an article is not a reason for deletion, per WP:NPOSSIBLE. As for sources, as well as the Chicago Tribune profile found by UnnamedUser [3], there are reviews in Substream Magazine [4], Third Coast Review [5], Hooligan Magazine [6], PopMatters [7], Audiofemme [8], and a couple of paras at the beginning of an interview in Vents Magazine [9]. They don't all have Wikipedia articles, but some of them do seem to have editorial overview. RebeccaGreen (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as per the significant coverage in multiple reliable sources identified above such as Chicago Tribune, PopMatters, Chicago Reader and others that show that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is not necessary in this case, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Subject has WP:SIGCOV meets WP:V and meets WP:MUSICBIO#5 Wm335td (talk) 20:28, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.