The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EncoreBassing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails to address WP:GNG and WP:PRODUCT and after searching GNews and GBooks to find no matches and Google in general to find only circular references, forum matches and download sites, there seems little prospect of this being addressed in the near future. PROD removed previously so raising for wider discussion. Fæ (talk) 10:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 10:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 10:16, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Big Dom 20:32, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 21:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unreferenced; as above, no coverage in reliable 3rd party sources. Dialectric (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.