The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Epsilon Iota Fraternity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is not notable, RS is just some blogs or college links. Tyros1972 Talk 22:22, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG alike. For what it's worth, the article has a balance problem and is poorly written too - it is not even clear what university(ies) this is about. But, no coverage anyway.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 00:45, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per WP:ORG and WP:GNG. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable; the few refs are passing mentions. Miniapolis 13:38, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.