![]() |
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bruce Woolley may be most known as an early member of The Buggles, but appearently that is the only significant independent coverage about him that I've seen. This is mostly an unsourced article that has absolutely no magazines or newspapers covering in-depth about Woolley other than his invovlment with The Buggles. Not even the fact that Woolley has been only credited as a writer of some hits could save this article. EditorEat ma talk page up, scotty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 23:34, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 01:06, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet either criterion set forth in WP:CRIME. MSJapan (talk) 23:12, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:02, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am unable to find any reliable source references to this coach. All references I turn up seem to be either user created content or copies of the Wikipedia article. Appears to fail WP:NFOOTY. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:22, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is not notable, RS is just some blogs or college links. Tyros1972 Talk 22:22, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article is lacking references that would affirm its encyclopedic value. The facetious writing style suggests this may have been done for fun. In my view, it falls completely short of WP:GNG. And Adoil Descended (talk) 21:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:09, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No apparent claim to notability. Technopat (talk) 21:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:36, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Promotional article for startup that fails WP:CORPDEPTH. I have checked all the sources. They are mostly bloggy and none is in-depth coverage. See also WP:TOOSOON Logical Cowboy (talk) 21:27, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Numerous gun law articles, including fully automatic/assault weapon law pages. No reason to have a page specifically for the ak47, and the laws discussed only cover a subset of the laws in existence, and also only a subset of the ak47 variants in existence. Merge anything valuable into the appropriate articles, and delete this one. Gaijin42 (talk) 19:30, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WIKIPEDIA DOES NOT GIVE LEGAL OPINIONS
Wikipedia contains articles on many legal topics; however, no warranty whatsoever is made that any of the articles are accurate. There is absolutely no assurance that any statement contained in an article touching on legal matters is true, correct or precise. Law varies from place to place and it evolves over time—sometimes quite quickly. Even if a statement made about the law is accurate, it may only be accurate in the jurisdiction of the person posting the information; as well, the law may have changed, been modified or overturned by subsequent development since the entry was made on Wikipedia.
The legal information provided on Wikipedia is, at best, of a general nature and cannot substitute for the advice of a licensed professional, i.e., by a competent authority with specialised knowledge who can apply it to the particular circumstances of your case. Please contact a local bar association, law society or similar association of jurists in your legal jurisdiction to obtain a referral to a competent legal professional if you do not have other means of contacting an attorney-at-law, lawyer, civil law notary, barrister or solicitor.
Neither the individual contributors, system operators, developers, nor sponsors of Wikipedia nor anyone else connected to Wikipedia can take any responsibility for the results or consequences of any attempt to use or adopt any of the information or disinformation presented on this web site.
Nothing on Wikipedia.org or of any project of Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., should be construed as an attempt to offer or render a legal opinion or otherwise engage in the practice of law.--RAF910 (talk) 20:50, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a corporation that is merely a rehash of what they do. There is no assertion to notability whatsoever beyond routine news articles, press releases, non-reliable and primary sources. Fails WP:CORP. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted as hoax by Peridon (talk · contribs) (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 21:31, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. From the creators, "Hopefully releasing within the next two months, this 2-years-in-development game will be bringing blocky simulation games to the next level." The prod was contested. SL93 (talk) 18:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that a PROD has recently been edit-warred over by IP editors, so I had a look at the article, and I have found no evidence at all of notability. The article contains no references, and the external links are all to the product's own web site. Google searches have also failed to produce any evidence of notability. The first Google hits were the company's own web site, the Wikipedia article, a download site, another page on the company's own web site, Facebook, Twitter, a comparison page that merely listed a few features, a forum, five more pages on the company's own web site, and then a spam page, advertising a product unrelated to Xpress Engine, but quoting text from the Wikipedia article Xpress Engine, evidently in an attempt to pull in custom from people searching for it ... and so it goes on through the other hits. Nothing anywhere even remotely suggests notability by Wikipedia standards. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:03, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable sports administrator with insufficient secondary source coverage, recently created. Orderinchaos 12:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I will be addinng information from the following three references in near future. Significant Australian sport administrator and part of the Australian paralympic Wikipedia History Project. Lois Appleby - personality profile.Rafferty, L., ANZALS Newsletter 1995: Vol. 5 Issue 1. p. 15 Interview with Lois Appleby: CEO of the 2000 Paralympic Games.Sen, T., Sweat May-Aug 1999: Issue 4. p. 18-19 The paralympics' very able organiser. By: Cromie, Ali. BRW. 18/08/1997, Vol. 19 Issue 31, p56. 4p. 5 (talk)
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Only notable for a recent newspaper article about what he wore in a yearbook photo. Don't think he is notable enough beyond this Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A non-notable cancelled video game. Tagged as failing notability guidelines since late 2009, and all in-depth coverage found from "Fuel (video game)"-type searches points to the newer 2009 game by Codemasters. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:14, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
searched and haven't been able to establish notability; e.g. no coverage from several notable, independent sources. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:37, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Challenged PROD. Challenger claims article is an "integral part of the Armenian diaspora". However, the articles fails WP:NOTDIR, especially criteria 3 and 4, as a mere listing of all of the Armenian churches in the U.S. I do not see its integrity. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:30, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Merging can be determined through normal editing and discussion. postdlf (talk) 16:35, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Does not demonstrate notability as sources are non WP:RSes and because of the name, I can't find any with a Google search. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:48, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I still believe this article fails WP:GNG. The coverage available is trivial coverage, I believe he fails WP:AUTHOR specifically. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 18:05, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This book fails WP:BK. There are no independent sources cited and I can't find any reliable reviews. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable according to WP:N Leobeaubien (talk) 19:29, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. postdlf (talk) 16:38, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is a WP:1E of an immigration dossier. The person is not notable and there is no claim of notability in the article. Farhikht (talk) 17:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:40, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to fail WP:NCYCLING. This appears to be a fairly new athlete that has not yet reached the level of notability for a Wiki article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:22, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
By the article's own admission, it is a promo. A promo with a limited release in the UK, no less. Notability is not substantiated in the article, and its only source appears to be a fansite and is a dead link anyhow. I ran a Google search for the following: (uncover him "i love you" "it's all tears") and received 265 results. Most of them were torrent download sites, the rest were fansites or YouTube pages or what have you. No actual coverage of the subject. It belongs in a place like Discogs, not here. LazyBastardGuy 22:52, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 18:05, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The band exists, and thought I could do something with this, but there's not enough information available. Merely a list of CVs of its members. I have hidden the content as a) it reads like a translation, and b) it could be copyvio. Technopat (talk) 17:52, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is a textbook example of WP:BLP1E, only known for his illness. Delete Secret account 18:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus is that the lack of independent reliable sourcing mandates deletion here. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable start-up. It has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Edcolins (talk) 19:37, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Gazetteer. Stifle (talk) 14:35, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The only results when searching for this publication on the internet are those of the publication itself. Due to this it appears to fail Wikipedia's general notability guidelines and notability guidelines for books. There is no hope of communication with the user who created this article, as the user (Claire Wynn was a suspected sock puppet of Gladys Tuffnell. Both accounts have been blocked indefinitely from Wikipedia. Jackc143 (talk) 20:21, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 01:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NALBUMS, WP:CRYSTAL. Article about an unreleased album, lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Little more than a track listing at this point. It may become notable once it's released, but at this time I can't find any reviews or other coverage in reliable sources, except this passing reference, which contradicts the information in the article. Pburka (talk) 21:06, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirected by User:Dolfrog as per below. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article has now been merged into Sensory processing disorder inline with merger discussion. dolfrog (talk) 14:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable IT / language training school. Not a degree granting institution, specious use of "Harvard". Online presence is a webs.com site. Hairhorn (talk) 14:00, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was SPEEDY KEEP. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) - MrX 17:31, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a non-notable city park. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 13:26, 19 July 2013 (UTC) - Withdrawn based on the long history of the park and secondary sources that have been found. - MrX 17:31, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, airport is not in existence yet. Can be rewritten when it's built. Suggest moving to userspace at most Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:13, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article is an attempt to publicise a brand new theory, announced to the world in a book published July 2013, which has not yet achieved notability. Whether it ever will do so remains to be seen: if and when it does we can have a Wikipedia article about it.
As originally written, the article was sourced only to the book in which the theory is published ("The Origin of Metazoa: An Algorithmic View of Life", by Rafaele Di Giacomo, Jeffrey H. Schwartz & Bruno Maresca). It is perhaps worth mentioning that the article was created by a single purpose account, every single one of whose edits publicises work by Rafaele Di Giacomo. The article was given a PROD saying, amongst other things, "Article is only sourced to a single paper from earlier this month", and, after the author of the article removed the PROD, the article was tagged with ((one source)). After that, the author added a whole string more "references", evidently in an attempt to avoid the impression of there being only one source. However, all of those additional sources were published years before the invention of Cell recursion theory. In fact, these additional references are not actually used in the article as citations for any statement about Cell recursion theory: they are used as citations for other matters that the article tries to link to Cell recursion theory: for example, the article says Brenner also stated that: “Biology urgently needs a theoretical basis to unify it and it is only theory that will allow us to convert data to knowledge”, and gives a reference for that, but it does not say that Brenner actually said anything about Cell recursion theory; nor could it, as the cited source was published three years before the publication of Cell recursion theory.
I have just done a Google search for -wikipedia "Cell recursion theory", and got no hits at all. A search for "Cell recursion theory" produced all of seven hits. One was the Wikipedia article, and the other six were pages at www.alternativefuse.com, none of which actually mention "Cell recursion theory". (It seems that Alternativefuse is one of those sites that fakes Google hits for things it picks up from Wikipedia in order to attract custom. To make sure, I used Alternativefuse's own site search facility, and confirmed that Alternativefuse has no page at all mentioning Cell recursion theory.)
The long and the short of all that is that there is no evidence anywhere of satisfying Wikipedia's notability criteria. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:59, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet WP:GNG because law firm does not have significant coverage, it is only mentioned in one source of the wikipedia article and has limited discussion elsewhere. AbstractIllusions (talk) 12:28, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't meet WP:NJOURNAL as far as I can see. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 09:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:07, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Surely this fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
per WP:POLITICIAN. Cybervoron (talk) 05:31, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:29, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I found nothing to show that this amateur sports team is notable. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 02:28, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There no such separate concept. It is merely a phrase "lofty"+"idealism", to express the concept of extreme (ethical) idealism. The construct is akin to other stable collocations, such as die-hard fan or brutal capitalism. The article does not give a definition (I failed to find one either). The abundant references are merely examples of someone being praised for or accused of "lofty idealism". Staszek Lem (talk) 01:09, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. No incoming links in article space, so no need to determine now whether this should be a redirect or to where. postdlf (talk) 16:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A single-line entry that does not even give his full name does not meet the requirements of the WP:GNG. There are a bizallion google hits, but with without a full name it's really hard to work out which are this person and which are someone else. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 00:59, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As a number, this is completely unnotable. It looks to me like this article only exists because 46664 is also the prison number of Nelson Mandela. But that's to do with him, not the number. — Amakuru (talk) 00:11, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:38, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I'm a Japanese Wikipedia (jawp) sysop. In jawp, this article is becoming a issue by the reason of copyvio. (ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/世界重要農業遺産システム, in Japanese.) For example, "Worldwide, specific agricultural ..." from [15], "For millennia communities" from [16], "In response to the global trends" from [17], "are selected based on their..." from [18]. Please determine whether this is a copyvio or not. Freetrashbox (talk) 12:17, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was soft delete. Stifle (talk) 14:37, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable author. No indications that either she or any of her books have received any significant attention. No reviews outside of Goodreads, and no press coverage of her other than some very local stuff. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Links to national reviews (Boston Globe, Tulsa World) have been added, as well as links to starred reviews from two of the four (Library Journal, Booklist) national reviewers. Kirkus and Publishers Weekly (the other of the big four) reviews are available on her website, which is also linked to the article.
The result was redirect to International versions of Jeopardy!. postdlf (talk) 00:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable French edition of Jeopardy. Beerest355 Talk 23:54, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]