The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article is lacking references that would affirm its encyclopedic value. The facetious writing style suggests this may have been done for fun. In my view, it falls completely short of WP:GNG. And Adoil Descended (talk) 21:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]