The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser ^TSU 08:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

European Union Prize for Cultural Heritage / Europa Nostra Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a lack of independent, substantial coverage about this prize. There are some general descriptions of it, but these are mainly on the EU website, so not independent. There are also some routine news reports that mention various entities having won the prize, but coverage in those cases is not substantial. There do not appear to be sources about this subject that are independent and in-depth. - Biruitorul ^Talk 19:37, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, the nature of the award is discussed in multiple books and articles (some of them I have included in the article) and the award is regularly covered in multiple-language reliable and independent sources (eg see here). Enough fo me for a claim of notability. Cavarrone (talk) 08:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a major international award. --AJHingston (talk) 23:28, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, sufficient secondary source coverage. — Cirt (talk) 17:31, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. Sourcing is an issue, but the award by an EU body is probably notable. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 22:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Passes GNG with reliable secondary coverage, such as BBC. Electric Catfish 01:14, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.