The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 23:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evan Frankfort (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

questionable notability; advertisement -- Gmatsuda (talk) 23:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's not exactly true. Minos could be suggesting that the nomination is pointy. XF Law talk at me 20:02, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Pointy" is close, but it implies some sort of rhyme or reason behind the nominations, which I cannot discern. One fairly common theme seems to be that any article which does not contain derogatory information about its subject may be deleted as "advertising," but even that is not consistent. I was not joking about the Oscar (as well as other awards) nominee, where the justification was that the factually accurate, verifiable article appeared to have been created by someone affiliated with one of the many films the subject had worked on. Minos P. Dautrieve (talk) 00:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.