The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fatal Vacation

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: This article does not specify why this film is remarkable. petiatil ^{»User »Contribs} 13:18, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 17:00, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 17:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Info: ~~Copyvio, text lifted directly from imdb.~~ P. S. Burton (talk) 19:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio has now been eliminated. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment: Article currently under work to address issues, as sources have been found under its original and Chinese language titles. Will report back. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:21, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per meeting WP:NF and per ongoing article improvements. This 1990 film has had international distribution under several different language titles and has been crtitically reviewed for years in multiple languages. Even as recently as a few days ago, the Manila Bulletin made note of this 21-year-old film and its similarity to a recent hostage situation in the Phillipnes.[1] What began as THIS unsourced stub is now a somehat better article. And yes, there's more available for further improvements. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a nice save that establishes notability in reliable sources, but what are those huge quotes in a foreign language doing there? Bigger digger (talk) 00:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks... and to answer your question... it's a neccessity per WP:RSUE: "Because this is the English Wikipedia, English-language sources should be used in preference to non-English ones, except where no English source of equal quality can be found that contains the relevant material. When quoting a source in a different language, provide both the original-language quotation and an English translation, in the text or in a footnote." So I did. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:32, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conversation continued at Talk:Fatal_Vacation#Foreign_text Bigger digger (talk) 21:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely done. Glad I could save this one. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:24, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 21:59, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.