The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:12, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feefeefly[edit]

Feefeefly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable person with no in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Creator has written multiple POVy articles which have been deleted or currently nominated for deletion. Zanhe (talk) 22:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting mostly to give people time to evaluate User:Underbar dk's sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 17:51, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:32, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.