The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:05, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flare (Techno-Cultural Fest)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not seem to meet notability criteria quite yet. Seems to be a little too soon at this point for them. I see an image of a single newspaper blurb linked to the article, but little else. Placing here after article's creator removed a PROD.-- Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 08:28, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are so many other awful pages on Wikipedia which does not have single citations and which do not deserve to be here. With all regards, I jsut want to point it out that even if its too early for making a page for this cultural event, its also a important one, and you can't ignore it. It has been taking place for last three years and therefore deserves to be in here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayush.3791 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm in agreement with Dennis about his response to the article creator, but there are a few articles that cover the event in a sufficient level of detail: [1] and [2]. I will add them to the article. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 06:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - references or not, the article is about a non-notable school event, and has WP:PEACOCKs all over the page to boot. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'd favor giving it a chance, and I find the referenced added in to mean it's going to have a minimum level of notability and will probably attract more sources in the future. —Ed!^(talk) 17:37, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--looks like it's passed the bar as far as outside sources go. Meelar (talk) 00:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.