The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move then merge to U.S. Route 61/190 Business and Baton Rouge#Highways and roads. (non-admin closure) czar · · 06:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Florida Boulevard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded with promise of better sources, but I see none in the link given. The only sources here so far are blogs. Merging to US Route 61/190 Business would be a bad move since this isn't the only Florida Boulevard in the world. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Apart from the existing merge discussion for U.S. Route 61/190 Business, there's an obvious alternative to deletion — merger with Baton Rouge#Highways and roads. The topic could be easily developed as it only takes seconds to find good sources. The nomination therefore seems quite frivolous and disruptive. Warden (talk) 11:24, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What part of "Merging would be a bad move IMO because there are other Florida Boulevards" did you not understand? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 12:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If there were other significant highways with the same name then this would be resolved by disambiguation not deletion. There don't seem to be though and you don't give any examples or evidence. Warden (talk) 12:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warden, what is it with you and being quite hostile to AfD nominators? You've accused TPH here of being disruptive without any evidence to back up your claim (an open merger discussion is not evidence to this regard), I remember you being assuming bad faith about one of mine (and assuming I'd never opened one before), and generally, in every AfD I've seen you in, you've appeared to be very hostile. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TPH, the solution to that is to move the page to Florida Boulevard (Baton Rogue) and then merge. Wham, bam, problem solved. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. The Insider's Guide to Baton Rouge has a small chapter on the road. There are a number of other interesting articles on GNews which, unfortunately, have broken links, e.g. "Florida Boulevard businesses leave downtown, move east". Pburka (talk) 15:49, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge is fine, too. Pburka (talk) 18:06, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to U.S. Route 61/190 Business - Relevant information can be covered there. Dough 48 72 02:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Florida Boulevard (Baton Rouge) to avoid dab concerns and then Merge to U.S. Route 61/190 Business and/or Baton Rouge#Highways and roads as appropriate. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 17:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Florida Boulevard (Baton Rouge) then Merge to U.S. Route 61/190 Business. That would seem to resolve everyone's concerns, no? Stalwart111 00:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.