The result was redirect to Dinah Shore. "Keep" arguments are WP:EFFORT. If you would like to argue that Wikipedia should be more inclusive, then propose it on a project talk page. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For Sentimental Reasons (Dinah Shore/Proper Records album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Prodded for lack of sources and notability. Deprodder added "sources" from Filmbug (doesn't look reliable) and CMT (reliable) that are literally no more than directory listings. A directory listing doesn't cut it. Precedent is that compilation albums have to assert individual notability, which these do not — there are literally no third party sources about either one. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:07, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. In general, if the musician or ensemble is notable, and if the album in question has been mentioned in multiple reliable sources, then their officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia. Unreleased material (including demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only recordings) are in general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting."
Per WP:OUTCOMES, though, compilations are far less likely to be notable unless they charted and/or were extensively reviewed; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Hits (Blue Öyster Cult album). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:17, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]