The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Freaky Boiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 23:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. I can only find one article about them, but that article has issues that are somewhat notable. With only a few other items they would pass GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:31, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 22. Snotbot  t • c »  00:14, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - existing coverage appears to fall short of meeting WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO, at least for now.  Gong show 18:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.