The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:00, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fu Tianlin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only thing I can see from a Google search are Wikipedia and mirrors. The only link in the article is a dead link. No, I am not saying that this is necessarily or even likely a hoax, but there's no verifiable information here. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 04:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I found an archived version of the dead link and added a few sources to the "further reading" section. One source calls her a "renowned writer and poetess", another says she is "one of China's most promising poets", and she apparently won a national poetry prize. I think that satisfies #1 of WP:CREATIVE and #1 of WP:ANYBIO. The article needs love and the sources could be better, but the subject is "worthy of notice". I wonder if there are alternate spellings or Chinese sources we could be looking for. Braincricket (talk) 07:19, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep based on the sources provided in the article following its nomination. Sailodge (talk) 12:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.