The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. PeaceNT 05:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fuckparade[edit]

Placing for deletion because this parade fails WP:N and is completely lacking in the reliable sources dept. We are not an advertising service for fuckparades. Burntsauce 20:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep This video is making its way around the net http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dJwODowvVY. I found the wikipedia entry while trying to contextualize the video. Although the information in the entry is minimal, it provides background as to what fuckparade is. If wikipedia is to serve as the definitive encyclopedia, pages like this need to kept and improved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.229.158.2 (talk) 18:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A video has popped up featuring a guy they call technoviking dancing at this event. People will be looking for information on what fuckparade is. The article should be kept. --75.162.79.135 05:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No comment on the AfD, yet anyway, but We are not an advertising service for fuckparades. should be added to WP:NOT, like yesterday. :) IvoShandor 20:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral hard to find sources for this most of them are in german, plus I have a feeling the term "Fuckparade" will be censored by most mainstream sources so I'm not sure how we would do a search. It seems to have plenty of coverage among the electronic/dance music crowd.Ridernyc 22:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's not the kind of thing that'll generate English-language coverage, but it's the subject of news articles every summer in the German daily newspapers (yes, with the word "Fuckparade" in the article title, which is a nice touch), so it meets notability and WP:V requirements: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Thomjakobsen 22:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral it almost seems like an excuse to use the "F-word" repeatedly. —Signed by KoЯnfan71^{My Talk}_{Sign Here!} 00:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep pity there isn't some latin name that editors can hide behind. This article satifys notability, verifiability it just has a title offensive to some. KTo288 00:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep extremely notable event associated with opposition to the commercialism of the Love Parade. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 02:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep verifiable event that has gained some wider notoriety. Crypticfirefly 03:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Not one German and most Europeans who've listened to any techno know haven't heard of it--Victor falk 03:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep appears to be a notable event, and I have no problem with the branding, we're not censored. RFerreira 22:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SRONG KEEP!!!! what most of you people dont know(from what it looks and seems like) in europe there is no censorship. Neither on tv nor in the media period. Deleting this would be a big hit for free speech specially on the internet wich is the only place where most americans can get have eny nowdays. Just cause something is called Fuckparade is no reason to delete it. If it offends you simply dont look. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedroperez420 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now and see if it improves. --SmokeyJoe 09:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete completely unnotable Knowitall 10:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Unless you want to AfD Love Parade too. Cowbert 04:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.