< October 9 | October 11 > |
---|
The result was delete without prejudice against recreation. For those who argue that this could be a legitimate topic (and I could see it as such), by all means write an article on the topic. However, we will not keep an essay lying around just because the essay happens to be about a notable subject that could theoretically have an encyclopedic article. As the arguments for keeping the article seem centered around the theoretically possible article rather than the article itself, I find them uncompelling. —Verrai 02:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reads like an essay, not an article. No external or intenral links. Orphaned. A few fairly spammy links at the bottom. Can't imagine that even with the best cleanup in the world it would become encyclopeadic. --Legis (talk - contribs) 00:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--David Shankbone 17:02, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, orphaned, irrelevant. can you say moo? Ⓐ 00:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not to mention there's almost no content in it. —Signed by KoЯnfan71 My Talk Sign Here! 00:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Regardless of how much info is currently in the article, general consensus is that villages are allowed per WP:OUTCOMES. And to be fair, the article does state that it is a stub. ARendedWinter 00:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge to Waffle Crisp. Elkman (Elkspeak) 16:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable and unencyclopediac - temporary mascot for a not particularly famous or historical product. No internal or external links to or from the article. --Legis (talk - contribs) 23:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 02:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious hoax; page says that player has played in 2023. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per CSD:A3. Stifle (talk) 21:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's an untitled CD that will be coming out sometime in 2008. There's no details in the article. When the CD gets released, and/or a title is given, then perhaps it can be recreated. Yngvarr (t) (c) 23:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No info is out for the album yet- but recreate when there is. Thanks, Codelyoko193 Talk Contributions 23:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No use having this one-line article here yet....—Signed by KoЯnfan71 My Talk Sign Here! 00:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete - there is significant and ubstantial enough disagreement in relation to the deletion of the article. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One man band that does not meet the WP:MUSIC notability guideline. Also nominated are the band's two albums. Delete as nom. Michael Greiner 23:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Up and coming band, fairly well known in the metal underground. *Keep all Scipo 03:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Userfy, moved to User:Aaron1509/Causal Explanation and Research Design. There are only 747 unique Ghits using the search terms given by Victor falk, so notability is indeed a question. The user, who is a new Wikipedian, admits it's a work in progress, so moving it into Aaron1509's user space protects it from deletion (somewhat) while it's improved. When it's fully fleshed out, it can be moved back into the mainspace. KrakatoaKatie 04:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm really not sure what this is supposed to be. I would have marked it as a nocontext speedy, but I feel like I'm missing something here. JuJube 23:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose "a work in progress" isn't acceptable. I'm trying to add a new article for something im interested in. Given the right amount of time i think this article will be useful to others with an interest in these areas. what can i do to keep this from being deleted? Aaron1509 23:55, 10 October 2007 (UTC)\[reply]
I'm kinda neutral on this one. It can have good info, but at the same time, it does have some info that I think could be cut. —Signed by KoЯnfan71 My Talk Sign Here! 00:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Natomas Unified School District with no merge as it is basically just a list of schools with no descriptions whatsoever.--JForget 00:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm unsure of the notability of this school. SolidPlaid 22:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was deleted by User:Academic Challenger. Non-admin closure. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 23:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable at the moment, and in any case unreferenced. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 22:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete by WP:SNOW as violating WP:MUSIC. Bearian 17:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A self-released demo album on tape. No sources. Not that notable a band, either. It's already on the Metal Archives, which is a great place for it. Cruftbane 22:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as non-notable. Thanks, Codelyoko193 TalkSign here 23:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was REDIRECT to SuccessTech Academy shooting, obviously, per the Wikipedia:Don't overreact policy. -Splash - tk 22:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Asa Coon was the gunman in the SuccessTech Academy shooting. The article was tagged for speedy deletion citing BLP concerns (I removed the CSD template), which is inappropriate for a two reasons: 1) The subject is no longer living and 2) BLP violations are not a CSD criterion. As more information becomes available, I suspect the article will contain more content than it currently does (two sentences). As the subject is only notable for this shooting, I don't think we really need an article on him. Perhaps a merge or a redirect are in order. Pablo Talk | Contributions 22:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to School District 5 of Lexington and Richland Counties--JForget 00:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability, and WP:OUTCOMES#Education states that while high schools are usually kept, middle and elementary schools aren't. J-ſtanTalkContribs 22:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to the school district Lexington & Richland County School District Five--JForget 00:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability, and WP:OUTCOMES#Education states that while high schools are usually kept, middle and elementary schools aren't. J-ſtanTalkContribs 22:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was a Redirect Lexington & Richland County School District Five--JForget 00:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability, and WP:OUTCOMES#Education states that while high schools are usually kept, middle and elementary schools aren't. J-ſtanTalkContribs 22:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Lexington & Richland County School District Five --JForget 00:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability, and WP:OUTCOMES#Education states that while high schools are usually kept, middle and elementary schools aren't. J-ſtanTalkContribs 22:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Lexington & Richland County School District Five--JForget 00:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability, and WP:OUTCOMES#Education states that while high schools are usually kept, middle and elementary schools aren't. J-ſtanTalkContribs 22:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete both as non-notable. The public company doesn't have an article but one can be created by someone. KrakatoaKatie 05:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
unsourced blp of a nn ceo, and his nn holding company.
Carlossuarez46 22:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
— Axelfoley2007 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Suggesting deletion for a number of reasons, primarily that WP:NOT a directory, and given the strong lack of encyclopedic context here, standard categories will more than suffice. Burntsauce 21:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedily deleted by User:Sam Blacketer. Non-admin closure. Euryalus 21:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
nn dj - has 239 google hits OSbornarfcontributionatoration 21:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was SPEEDY DELETE as a copyvio (G12). But|seriously|folks 07:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reads something like a rambling ad. Pretty much a list of achievements. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 21:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was WP:BOLDly redirected, seeing no objections. Non-admin closure. shoy 22:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation page containing only two senses of the word, and one sense is not in accordance with naming convention Bsherr 21:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This to to provide a fuller explanation for deletion of this disambiguation page. The disambiguation page "The Queen" consturcts the phrase in two senses: (1) third person reference to a female monarch, and (2) the so-named motion picture The Queen (film).
In the first sense, use of the phrase in context would not include capitalization of the article--"the Queen" and not "The Queen". Therefore, an entry in this sense of the phrase should properly be named "Queen" and not "The Queen", in accordance with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite and indefinite articles at beginning of name).
The second sense, in context, would inclue a capitalized article--in the movie "The Queen"--and is proper under naming conventions.
There are no other senses of this word included in the disambiguation page here proposed for deletion.
The problem with maintianing this disambiguation page is that it invites (and its history and current form indicate) redundancy, in the first sense of usage, with Queen, a disambiguation page that is properly named in this sense of the phrase in accordance with the naming convention. Efforts to maintain this article to do only (1) refer to Queen and (2) refer to The Queen (film) have not been able to be maintained due to unawareness of this intent and of the naming conventions.
I therefore propose: (1) deletion of this disambiguation page (2) installation of a redirect to the film page "The Queen" (3) preserving the properly executed link to the disambiguation page Queen on The Queen (film) Bsherr 21:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 06:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Probably non notable piece of software (less than 400 google hits) - no RS, to establish notability OSbornarfcontributionatoration 21:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, alright. Delete the article then. Sorry for the inconvenience that I caused. --89.215.65.176 (talk) 23:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 06:03, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable online organization; Google search reveals no references outside virtual airline directories. Canwolf 20:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I got the approval from the CEO and founder of AFA to make this page. He allowed me to use most if not all of the info. He said it didn't bother him if I copied and pasted the info (which I didn't). Please don't delete this page. ArmoredPersonel 22:14, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete as spam. Pascal.Tesson 11:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
most likely nn, potential SPA/COI OSbornarfcontributionatoration 20:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC) (and it reads like an ad OSbornarfcontributionatoration 20:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]
The result was delete. Maxim(talk) (contributions) 15:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just another list of a non-notable intersection of characteristics. I'm not disputing that it's well-sourced and the people on it are probably notable, simply the list concept is not. Stifle (talk) 20:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep as a stub per WP:OUTCOMES. Bearian 19:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see no point in this article's continued existence. It's been tagged for cleanup for five months now with no particular improvement, and while it's theoretically improvable (cultural attitudes to outdoor pursuits etc) I don't really see any particular point to it. As the IP says on the talk page, this article is unnecessary in its present form; it doesn't really say anything that isn't obvious from combining the dicdefs of "outdoors" and "activity". — iridescent (talk to me!) 20:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Suggesting deletion as I am unable to verify any of the information within the two sentences that make up this article, other than the fact he appeared in a couple of skateboard videos. Sources were requested sixteen months ago back in June 2006, we're now at October 2007 and nothing has turned up. If someone can provide a reliable source that confirms he was ranked number one by some sort of skating authority I will respectfully withdraw this nomination, but for now it fails WP:BLP and pretty much everything else we have. Burntsauce 20:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep - has written at least three books and works with UNESCO, meets WP:PROF. KrakatoaKatie 05:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Placing for deletion because this person does not meet WP:PROF or any other biography guideline that I'm aware of, and also lacks anything in the way of reliable third party sources about the subject. Burntsauce 20:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 23:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Placing for deletion because this person is simply not notable enough for an encyclopedia, including this one according to our WP:BIO guidelines. It could be argued that this also fails WP:BLP as well as there are no reliable third party sources to speak of. Burntsauce 20:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. PeaceNT 05:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Placing for deletion because this parade fails WP:N and is completely lacking in the reliable sources dept. We are not an advertising service for fuckparades. Burntsauce 20:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SRONG KEEP!!!! what most of you people dont know(from what it looks and seems like) in europe there is no censorship. Neither on tv nor in the media period. Deleting this would be a big hit for free speech specially on the internet wich is the only place where most americans can get have eny nowdays. Just cause something is called Fuckparade is no reason to delete it. If it offends you simply dont look. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedroperez420 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep as notable. Bearian 14:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Suggesting deletion because the establishment fails WP:CORP and lacks reliable third party sources about the subject. Burntsauce 20:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Consensus is that the topic does not meet the general notability guidelines. Miami Sun Post September 27, 2007 is a reliable source. The four PR releases might have a total of sentence or two of article material: July 27, 2007 PR, August 13, 2007 PR, August 16, 2007 PR, and August 20, 2007 PR. MarketShift.com July 27, 2007 is a blog, not a Wikipedia reliable source. inmanwiki.com is a summary of press release material, not a Wikipedia reliable source. Also, the article was improved during the AfD to address promotional concerns. Although the SPA argue keep, no non-SPA has argued keep. It is clear that the delete reasonings reviewed the references and likelihood for other reliable source material and provide the stronger argument. -- Jreferee t/c 15:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Because there are a confusion of promotional websites reporting on this business site as "news", I'm unable to tell whether this is a legitimate and notable business. Notable for Wikipedia inclusion, that is. It doesn't help that the text is written like a press release touting its importance with a very positive POV. Pigman 20:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Consensus is that the article cannot meet Verifiability. Both the keep and delete reasoning agree that more sources are needed, but consensus is that there are no more sources such that the article cannot meet Verifiability. The keep arguments regarding importance/significance do not aid in determining whether the article can meet Verifiability. -- Jreferee t/c 15:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Never heard of this rapper. No WP:SOURCES, very little context (not much more than a discography, still haven't heard of most of what's on there, probably fails WP:MUSIC) . Might be notable if the article can pass WP:V, although right now I'm leaning towards delete. Rackabello 20:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PeaceNT 05:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Described as an uncommon pain syndrome occurring in someone who suffers a physical trauma after being under mental stress for a long time. No sources offered, NORD URL at the bottom leads to the NORD website but the site does not list "inner bone pain" as a recognised condition. It gets six Google hits, mostly Wikipedia and mirrors, and searching PubMed for Dr Tyler Coles does not lead to an article that describes such a syndrome. I think this article is a hoax, and needs to be deleted. JFW | T@lk 20:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Consensus is that the topic meets the general notability guidelines. Consensus is that there is more than enough reliable source material for the article. The how-to issues may be addressed through a clean-up tag. The name of the article is appropriate, as a simple search shows that the topic is called 'choking game' by the media. See, for example, Boy's death prompts 'choking game' fears. Officials won't release cause of Slinger death. Choking game seems the most likely terms by which those interested in the topic would search for the topic on Wikipedia. The name of the article might offend some, but that is no reason to delete the article and not a basis to rename the article. Merge into or with Chokehold, Erotic asphyxiation, and/or Autoerotic fatality might have been a possible outcome, but that that was not discussed sufficiently, particularly in view of the significant "choking game" reliable source material available. -- Jreferee t/c 15:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No directly pertinent reliable sources, but plenty of how-to (the primary section is "How the choking game works" -- works?!?) about how to make yourself pass out and very likely die. Wikipedia is not a how-to, and this is essentially a form of (terrible) medical advice.
The result was No consensus. The discussion addressed whether the topic was important/significant enough, an issue that may be addressed through CSD A7. There was little to no discussion on whether enough reliable source material exists for the topic to meet general notability guidelines and for the article to meet Wikipedia:Verifiability. The delete reasoning was weak such that the consensus could not be delete per policy. -- Jreferee t/c 16:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable academic competitor and high school kid. I found this article on a request for comment; I thought it was so ridiculous that I went ahead and put it here. Well, he did get a NG article for winning a geography bee, but I still don't think he's notable. Sorry if that's poor etiquette. Cap'n Walker 19:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Although the topic may be important/significant enough to meet CSD A7, consensus is that the topic does not meet the general notability guidelines due to the lack of sufficient reliable source material. -- Jreferee t/c 16:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Buffy the Vampire Slayer Collectible Card Game is a collectible card game based on Buffy the Vampire Slayer. And that, restated in a number of innovative and verbose ways, is about it. Oh, wait, no, we also have the rules. And a game guide. Seriously, one could almost speedy this as being nothing more than a restatement of the title. There is nothing here that is not completely obvious from the combination of "Buffy" and "collectible card game". As far as I can tell this is just a completely generic spin-off "game" (i.e. trading card marketing hype) which is indistinguishable in any important respect from a dozen others. It's not spam, they don't seem to make it any more, and it's not even really Buffycruft, as it's not about Buffy at all, it's just a write-up by fans of the game. There is enough decent material here for a sentence in the Buffy franchise article: "And there was a trading card game". Cruftbane 19:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 06:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - scarcely notable, certainly not under WP:NOTE. It contains mainly material drawn from the two episodes in which it appeared; both episodes' articles already contain this info and a note about its double occurrence, so nothing would be lost by its deletion. NB... Limehouse Green station is a redirect page that will also need to be deleted. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 18:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Cool Hand Luke 00:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable cellular phone. This product isn't notable; it's just another incarnation of a common object with no discerning features, no sustaining influence on the market or design, and little longevity. Reads like an advert; just a list of specs and no substantial sources. Listing after contested prod. Mikeblas 18:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable individual Rapido 18:32, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as violating WP:NOT, with the caveat to create a proper article per WP:LAW or to wikisource it later. Actual text cut-and-paste of a case is also potentially a copyright violation of WestLaw, of which we must stay clear. I've edited hundreds of legal articles here at WP, and this is the only one I've seen that literally can not be fixed. Bearian 15:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Some sort of non encyclopedic description of a lawsuit? OSbornarfcontributionatoration 18:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep (nomination withdrawn). Non-admin closure. Pablo Talk | Contributions 22:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re-opening this AfD. Please see below the colored box. Corvus cornix 22:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Probable hoax, in any case, nothing on the radio. Recreated material. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 18:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC) Withdrawn nom OSbornarfcontributionatoration 18:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re-opening this AfD. This should be deleted, since Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Corvus cornix 22:55, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia may not be a newspaper, but the event was notable.
-- Mik 22:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Comment Maybe i'm wrong, but this half closed/half open AFD seems to be the wrong way to go in my personal opinion. I'd think either DRV or AFD #2 would be a cleaner option.--Cube lurker 04:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Closed as Delete WP:NOT for stuff made up in school one day, and consensus below seems unlikely to ever be anything other than delete. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 04:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not for games that you made up in school one day and already exist in other more well known forms. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 18:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete due to lack of sources. W.marsh 18:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Probable hoax, possibly nn. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 18:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was SPEEDY DELETE per A7, G11 and G12. -- But|seriously|folks 06:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Written in first person, probably nn person. Possible WP:OWN, WP:N, and WP:COI violations just off the bat. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 18:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was consensus to delete. Cool Hand Luke 00:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BIO. In 2 years since the first AfD, no substantial secondary sources have been added, only one site which (trivially) lists her films. There is no indication in the article that she meets the guidelines; no notable awards, coverage in the mainstream media, etc. are claimed. Also, as is well known, a long filmography is not an indicator of notability for pornographic actors, since such films can easily be produced by the dozen. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 18:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Elkman (Elkspeak) 16:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Probably non notable comic, page is not particularly encyclopedic. (member list, and trivia are prominent) OSbornarfcontributionatoration 18:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dude, I'm a member of this comic but i dont think we deserve our own Wiki Page, DELETE! Sorry Mellie, ~Victorkool —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.3.196 (talk) 19:42, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:14, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Legis (talk - contribs) 17:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable bio of local TV personality Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 17:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep (non-admin closure). Pablo Talk | Contributions 07:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time
The article is a magnet for POV, OR and vandalism, and mostly consist of a top 10 list and a hunk of unsourced trivia and analysis. As well, there are no sources that prove their significance. An article published by a magazine isn't notable simply because it caused some debate. There was a similar article for the 100 Greatest Guitarists that was deleted roughly a year ago. The AFD can be found for that here. At the very least, the page should be merged into the Rolling Stone article. Scorpion0422 17:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge/redirect. W.marsh 18:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pure original research, not sure if it asserts WP:NOTE but has no confirmed sources or for that matter, refs. Article has been existent since 21 August 2004 and not once has a useful citation or external link been added. Merge to List of comic book superpowers#Energy blasts at this time. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete. It's a copyvio of this page CitiCat ♫ 04:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOT, loaded with OR, likely an autobiography as it was written by a SPA Toddstreat1 17:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was consensus to delete. No sources, possible fraud. Cool Hand Luke 00:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This was originally in Tagalog and was translated. I wasn't sure if this was an attack page or not; I was concerned about the potential for slander/libel. This might qualify for deletion as a neologism, since there are no references. I thought I'd bring it to AfD and let everyone express their opinion. Accounting4Taste 16:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All the saying is true, though. Name one false accuse if you can.
- Are we trying to hide the truth? The terms of Malingsia nowadays is getting popular among Indonesian (you should watch all Indonesian Forum for this). About the terrorist, maybe that is the only thing that we need to edit, because we need a further investigation. I am not happy with the fact that Wiki is trying the truth from the world. Are we hiding the fact that there's a war in Iraq? I dont think so? This is history and we need to preserve it. petualangan
The result was consensus to delete. Possible hoax. Cool Hand Luke 00:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This totally-unsourced article, created by an SPA which never edited again after creating it, appears to be a hoax: a search on "Business 2000 Magazine," the publication in which the subject purportedly placed 35th on a list of the "Top 100 Women in Business to Watch in 2000," generates one lone Google hit, so it would appear the publication may not even exist, let alone ever have named the subject to their "Top 100". Searches on "Samantha Basile" and "oil" or "petroleum," the industry in which she is purported to be a "leader," return a small handful of hits -- including, it appears, to the subject's LinkedIn profile -- but nothing suggesting the subject's supposed prominence in the petroleum industry. --Rrburke(talk) 16:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't appear to meet WP:Notability. G-hits are limited and my admittedly cursory look through the G-hits didn't find news stories about it. Without reliable sources, I'm inclined to sayd delete it. Pigman 16:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Due to low participation, I will consider undeleting if anyone can make an argument for it on my talk page. W.marsh 18:51, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
N/N org that fails to establish notability Lugnuts 16:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Close due to withdrawal of nom thus default keep--JForget 00:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced video game with no evidence of notability. Not all video games are notable. Bart133 (t) (c) 16:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was closed as a duplicate AfD; the principal AfD for this article is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salian Mythology. Sandstein 21:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. -- Longhair\talk 23:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-notable amateur film maker. The article's claim to notability is that he has made award winning films, yet the source quoted (a press release issued by bayside.vic.gov.au, not news sources) indicate that his "prize" was a $30 book voucher and a DVD. I'm not knocking it; but there's a big difference between winning an Emmy, Oscar or other similar award and winning thirty Australian dollars. B1atv 16:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. W.marsh 18:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nn teacher. See originator's talk page for the unusual usage of "Rosh Yeshiva" used at YU. Dweller 16:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete, CSD:G12 (blatent copyvio) -- RoySmith (talk) 16:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Dave miguel[edit]Blantant copyvio of this site, reads like a press release, author has removed copyvio and db-copyvio tags three times with no changes to article text, re-added tour dates to article. Speedy Delete Improbcat 15:55, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to Spanish Courts for Violence against Women. WaltonOne 09:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Juzgados de Violencia sobre la Mujer[edit]
Impossible to correct POV, Essay, Patent Nonsense Zape82 15:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rewrite and rename to an English name Subject definitely of encyclopedic notability--Victor falk 04:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Stubbify and rename to a mos appropiate name Maybe the law's name, definetly this name doesn't comply with the spanish court organisationZape82 10:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Its now called Spanish Courts for Violence against Women on the English language site. If or when its agreed, I can post a Spanish language version "Juzgados de violencia sobre Mujeres". Pls more advice, and "Stubbify"? Rubén Mar 18:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Future Guy[edit]Lead kind of says it all: Future Guy is a fanon nickname. Goes on to say that there is no backstory, and the rest is plot summary. Only cited "source" is to a non-reliable wiki site. Redirect to Temporal Cold War might be appropriate, but that article, too, is just plot summary. --EEMeltonIV 15:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC) PS: "Future guy" also seems an unlikely search term, another reason a redirect may not be appropriate. --EEMeltonIV 11:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Lone Star Fraternity[edit]
Does not provide sources or citations, or even a website. Does not say how, why, or even IF it is notable. —ScouterSig 15:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Elkman (Elkspeak) 16:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Will Waterman[edit]
This young karter seems to have had some articles in the local paper, but doesn't seem to be competing at the highest level in his sport, and so doesn't appear to meet the notability criteria. Prod removed by creator, a friend of the subject. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Kayvon Zand[edit]Delete nn model/actor with bit part roles, fails WP:BIO Carlossuarez46 14:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. W.marsh 18:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Dimoxinil[edit]Delete fictional drug used in one episode of The Simpsons with no real world notability, and per WP:FICT Carlossuarez46 14:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Castle Hill, New South Wales#Education--JForget 00:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Samuel Gilbert Public School[edit]
Non-notable primary school with 600 kids, says it all. Given the lack of an agreement at WP:SCH, it fails WP:N and WP:ORG. Twenty Years 14:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I don't see any rational for a redirect to Sandžak, but if there is a good reason, a redirect can be created. W.marsh 19:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Sandžaklija[edit]Well, learn something new every day—the Balkans seem to produce new ethnicities at a remarkable speed. Basically, we have here some soapboxing about a fictitious new ethnic identity: to cut the long story short, the term "sandžaklija" does exist, and it refers to an inhabitant of Sandžak. In a more restricted sense, it is commonly applied to muslims of Sandžak, vast majority of whom declared their ethnicity as either Bosniak or Muslims by nationality. The rest of the article is a fiction.Duja► 14:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 19:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Andrea cavaletto[edit]
I have nominated this article~for the following reasons: Not notable, no references, POV, vanity...Iamchrisryan 16:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was CSD A7 (Band). ➔ REDVEЯS was here 19:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Audrey Lane[edit]I have nominated this article for deletion: Not Notable WP:MUSIC. an unsigned unreferenced band. Iamchrisryan 16:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was close, discussion is taking place here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Atlantis personnel in Stargate. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 19:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] List of Stargate Command personnel[edit]
The result was Close. Incorrectly created by DumbBOT (well, there you go). See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monster Manual IV for ongoing debate. CitiCat ♫ 18:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Monster Manual V[edit]
The result was converted to a disambiguation page. On my watchlist. ➔ REDVEЯS was here 19:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] On the rocks[edit]The current revision is totally new content and subject but I looked through a number of revisions back to the start and I can't really see that this article has been or will be anything significant. If someone wants to make something more out of the article, fine, go for it. I'd say it's currently a non-notable record label. Pigman 23:18, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was WP:CSD#A7; notability not asserted; what's in there is specious. ➔ REDVEЯS was here 19:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Tyson Johnson[edit]
I have nominated this article for deletion since this person is a high school athlete. I don't believe the information brought forth in the article warrents an article. not notable. Iamchrisryan 16:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep--JForget 00:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Tsundere and Yandere[edit]
Neologisms. Articles seem to be sourced from blogs. Tony Sidaway 14:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep--JForget 00:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Proposed Interstate Highways[edit]
I think this article should be deleted, after any appropriate information is merged somewhere. It currently contains information about 7 "proposed" interstate highways. I believe this falls under the category WP:CBALL. 5 out of the 7 "proposed" highways have individual articles anyways. Those may also be crystal-ball articles, but I haven't checked them. Rjd0060 14:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Rjd0060 14:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. W.marsh 19:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] 255 McKibbin[edit]"The common theme in the notability guidelines is the requirement for verifiable objective evidence to support a claim of notability. Substantial coverage in reliable sources constitutes such objective evidence, as do published peer recognition and the other factors listed in the subject specific guidelines." This looks like some urban factory where they made mattresses or light bulbs or something. Was the first light bulb manufactured there? There must be literately thousands of these buildings all across America. Just because some "artists" currently live there does not make it notable. Did Andy Warhol live there, or was it a textile factory for the last hundred years. Just because _you_ live there does not make it notable, regardless of the awesomeness of your Pabst parties. Furthermore a mention in some Gawker article is not notability. Anyone can write a blog post, that is the definition of a blog. Was there an editor involved, was there any research done on this building for the article. Again, because some friend of a friend wrote something on a blog doesn't mean anything regardless of readership. A lot of people also bought the Weekly World News, should there be wikipedia articles about alien babies. If this continues, next thing you know every Hipster in Williamsburg is going to want to write a wikipedia article on the converted loft they currently live in, to re-enforce the awesomeness of the apartment they're paying $3K a month to live in. In marketing terms, this is called "diluting the brand" every address in the world could potentially have its own wikipedia entry, but why. What thirteen year-old is going to look up "12 Main", or whatever. In other words it is a non notable building; it is not a historical buidling, or an architectural masterpiece; it is not influential nor heavily discussed, and certainly not "somewhat legendary" as described in the article discussion. Plus no claims of importance in the article. Delete please. - DrVonMalfoy (talk) 14:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)— Possible single purpose account: DrVonMalfoy] (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.[reply]
The result was delete as failing WP:BIO, WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:N, and WP:RS. Bearian 23:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Marie-Therese Emma Caraher Gilbert[edit]
Non-notable beauty pageant contestant, namely Mrs World (note not Miss World). Fails WP:BIO, no independent, reliable sources stated, and none are likely to be found given the very limited press coverage on her. Stu ’Bout ye! 13:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Data administration. Daniel 09:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Data resource management[edit]
This has been a stub for almost 2 years. It is possible somebody could write an article about this topic, but if nobody has done so in 2 years, we should just drop it. If somebody wants to come along later and write the article, it's easy enough to recreate. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete--JForget 00:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Yosef mreh[edit]
The result was Keep. -- Longhair\talk 23:21, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Sydney Explorer[edit]
Here's an interesting one. The creator wants this article he created deleted, believing it's spam. He even went so far as to slash out the refrences before trying to have it deleted and tagging it as G4. However, others have worked on the article (even undeleting it once) and wish to save it. Therefore, I'm bringing it here to help sort it out. This is procedural for me, but I'm leaning towards keep. (and by the way, WP:CSD#G7 doesn't apply, since the creator is not the only contributor) UsaSatsui 13:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Trenton, Florida, retaining edit history for GFDL purposes. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Trenton High School (Florida)[edit]
Horrible article, littered with POV statements, no links, and terrible prose. Needs to be deleted if it cannot be improved. Floaterfluss (talk) (contribs) 13:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, no support for deletion now, nomination has been withdrawn, non admin closure. Davewild 07:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Rome High School[edit]
The result was irrelevant, as the nominator has no desire to see the articles in question deleted or even merged (which wouldn't belong on AFD anyway), and is dangerously close to adding to his already impressive block history. Don't make people argue against positions you don't hold. —Cryptic 12:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Belldandy[edit]
Non-notable four main characters from Oh My Goddess!. If not even the main characters aren't notable enough to be stand alone articles, neither should a list of them. -- Cat chi? 12:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Yehoshua Sofer. --Aarktica 19:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Abir (martial art)[edit]
The following concern was expressed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Abir (martial art): "I think this article is realy strange. Probably you should ask you if it's not a hoax, please take a look on this link.--Kimdime69 20:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)" And indeed upon deeper examination of the article it appears to be nothing more that one paragraph about a non-notable individual (with lots of photos of himself) who has introduced "Abir®" in Israel (as his website states a few times, [37] [38]) as a disguised version of the Korean martial art of Kuk Sool Won. 95% of the rest of the article and the sources it cites is tangential information and vignettes that deal with with this or that group of Jews who fought or engaged in warfare during the long stretch of Jewish history, and not directly related to "Abir®" at all in any direct way. Thus this article violates WP:NOR as well as WP:NOT#OR; WP:NOT#ADVERTISING; WP:NOT#MYSPACE; and based on the information provided by User:Kimdime69 it may also be a violation of WP:HOAX. IZAK 12:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 19:14, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] List of battles fought during Ramadan by Muslims[edit]
Dubious intersection of topics leading to an implicit WP:COATRACK conclusion. WP:POVFORK of List of wars in the Muslim world. Article was originally cribbed from this source though copyvio is difficult to argue at this stage. Article could be improved if scope and title were changed but in present state seems only designed to prove a point. Dhartung | Talk 11:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. W.marsh 19:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Chicago Cubs all-time roster[edit]This article is just a direct, long copy of Category:Chicago Cubs players with no real new information (other than playing time, which the articles all contain). Seems to serve little purpose to me. Staxringold talkcontribs 11:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. WaltonOne 10:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Space Hijackers[edit]
Apparently non-notable anarchist (or as they call themselves "anarchitect") group; article lists no third-party coverage. Delete; I only do not request speedy deletion for lack of a claim of notability because the article has escaped attention since the year 2003 when it was created. - Mike Rosoft 11:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. CitiCat ♫ 21:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Yeshivish (culture)[edit]
This is a poorly-written stub that cites no sources (because there are none) and could be mistaken as even meaning to slander Haredim who are non-Hasidim. "Yeshivish" is perhaps a slang word, and there is already a Yeshivish article for that. If it is another way of describing non-Hasidic Haredim, then add this paragraph there. But there is absolutely no "yeshivish" "culture" just as there is no "Chasidish culture" or "Modern Orthodox culture" etc etc (but yes, there is Hasidic Judaism and Modern Orthodox Judaism.) The article (actually it's one silly paragraph) makes wild claims that the term applies to American Orthodox Jews in yeshivas, and if so, then it could have been added to the yeshiva article or to the Orthodox Judaism article. While one can speak of Orthodox Judaism and Haredi Judaism, they may perhaps be called "cultures" although Judaism is a religion not a culture. This article, the notion it tries to convey, and the way it tries to convey it, is absurd and fits nowhere because it verges on the vulgar and there is no way it could ever be quantified especially in a serious encyclopedia. It violates WP:NOR, WP:CITE, WP:NEO and borders on WP:LIBEL. IZAK 08:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine[edit]
These medical schools lack notability. Whilst many sources mention each one, coverage is not detailed and in-depth. A teaching college normally gains notability through the recognition of it's teaching and research. The articles are also being used as a soapbox and a great deal of content fails WP:NPOV. DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 10:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] I am also nominating the following related pages because they fail the Notability, NPOV and Soapbox criteria mentioned above:
As well as the original author of each article, I've also notified the top 5 contributors (including anon IPs) given by http://vs.aka-online.de/wppagehiststat/ for each article (link from WP:AfD), except for one retired user. However, I have not sent multiple notifications to those authors who appear in the top 5 for more than one article. DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 11:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Note: This is the second nomination for University of Health Sciences Antigua, please see the previous discussion here, which was closed as Keep. Leuko 20:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:51, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Clinton H. Wallace (photographer)[edit]
He takes pictures of people at parties (here). He "interviews" minor celebs for videos posted at Youtube (try Google). He's taken the stills for some obscure movies (here). He's the executive producer for Cielo Drive (running time six minutes). I wish his career well, but right now he's clearly NN. -- Hoary 09:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Daniel 09:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] List of career achievements by Dwyane Wade[edit]
While certainly a good basketball player, this is basically a too-detailed list of obscure statistics about a young basketball player who has an unsure place in history at this point. Violates WP:IINFO among other guidelines. This is just overkill, and is easily summarized in his main article. If he becomes washed up or injured in the near future, this page will look very silly. And please don't give arguments like "Dwyane Wade is notable", since he is, but that's not the issue, it's the issue of various stats as his own page is notable. Dannycali 08:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2007 (UTC)
The result was delete. PeaceNT 04:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Sigma Pi Oakland[edit]
Article of a part of a larger organization, in accordance with Wikipedia is not a directory. See WP:NOT Samwisep86 08:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep without consensus. Some improvement has been made for WP:RS per WP:HEY, but notability is not yet clearly established. Note that I am not a fan of the series, so I take no stance on this AfD's merits. Bearian 19:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Eidelon[edit]Fancruft about a fictional race, with lots of plot summary but without sources demonstrating notability. Gavin Collins 08:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] 219 Michigan Avenue[edit]
Non notable building. Not a historical buidling, not an architectural masterpiece, not influential, not heavily discussed. No claims to importance in the article. Fram 08:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep - there seems to be fair consensus that this video game is notable: it has been reviewed professionally and it seems to have received a fair share of press coverage. This needs to be sourced though, as do several tens of thousands of other articles relating to commercial subject matters. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Cabal Online[edit]AfDs for this article:
Article wsa deleted through Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cabal Online only a few months ago, but this is not a straight G4 recreation. However, again there is no indication of any notability, the article has been tagged for several months now. I see no reason why the conclusion of the last AfD can't be applied straightforward again here. Fram 07:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I think the old AfD has at most very minimal relevance. Arguments from the previous AfD:
— xDanielx T/C 22:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Comment - The game is already out. In Asia and Europe as well Brazil. Just because the US and Canada (which are stated in the article) still haven't received their version of the game, this doesn't simply give the people reason to delete the article.
There are at least several other MMORPG articles here on Wikipedia which have less then 2 lines, and no citation on them, yet they aren't nominated for deletion. Every tried Archlord? I think this article is more well written then that one. AceAngel T/C 22:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was: Speedily deleted - no claim of notability. - Mike Rosoft 11:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Idiots on wheels[edit]
Is this group really notable enough to be included within an encyclopaedia? I've certainly never heard of them. I think it's self-promo. RyanLupin (talk/contribs) 07:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep--JForget 01:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Romulan Star Empire (Star Fleet Universe)[edit]
This in universe plot summary provides no real world context, analysis, critisism or secondary sources to demonstrate notability of this fancruft. --Gavin Collins 07:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete by author request. —Cryptic 03:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Daniel Elmaleh[edit]
Not notable politician, fails WP:BIO. Brewcrewer 07:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I lived in Charlotte, too and this guy is a musician as well. An interesting enough character to have an article. I will see if I can find links to his albums. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesTabfield (talk • contribs) 01:00, 11 October 2007; this was his fourth edit
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Great Public Schools Association of Queensland Inc. Rugby Premierships[edit]
List of winners of an amatuer school rugby competition. No relevance to any of the articles concerned, fails any sort of notability. Twenty Years 07:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge. As far as I can tell, preserving the edit history will be needed to do a merge here. W.marsh 14:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Mims discography[edit]
This article should e deleted and it's content moved to MIMS Ridernyc 06:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 00:15, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 113[edit]
This is a straight copy-paste from the cited source, with each case made into a wikilink. Not one of these cases has an article, and it seems unlikely that any meaningful proportion of them will have articles as most of the cases are not actually that interesting. If the list included a brief summary of the case and its significance that might make it useful, but it lacks even that. And again, the cases are not that interesting. so such a summary is not that likely. Just because we are legally allowed to copy-paste from this source does not mean we should be doing so, I think. Cruftbane 06:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WjBscribe 03:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] It's Alright (MIMS song)[edit]
Another song with no notabilty. Ridernyc 06:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete per A7 --DarkFalls talk 06:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Without You (Mims song)[edit]
Nothing Notable about this song. Ridernyc 06:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 15:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Hereditary Prince Richard Kincaid-Lake[edit]Hoax article containing no valid information, which seems to have been created by the purported subject of the article Nunh-huh 06:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. W.marsh 23:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Cute Little Farts[edit]
minor routine, not noteworthy in general or compared to the rest of Carlin's work, no need for an article Ugliness Man 05:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G11, blatant advertising. - auburnpilot talk 07:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Erantis[edit]Delete pretty much an advertisement for a nn real estate developer. Carlossuarez46 04:55, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Aarktica 23:11, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Evil Harrisons[edit]
Delete nn unsigned band, fails WP:BAND. Carlossuarez46 04:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 16:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Eurekahedge Pte Ltd[edit]
Delete no indication that this comany meets WP:CORP Carlossuarez46 04:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus--JForget 00:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Credins Bank[edit]Delete nn bank, fails WP:CORP. Carlossuarez46 04:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 16:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Market Culture[edit]
This may be a perfectly valid article. I'm unable to penetrate the ad-speak employed in the article. It originally had suggestions for a web search, which screamed to me of probable advertising placement from companies in the top of the Ghits. I'm just very, very suspicious of this article. I'm going to say this is for not meeting WP:Notability but I'm mostly wanting feedback about whether this could be a legit article or not. Pigman 01:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect from merge. GRBerry 14:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Alive Bible Club[edit]
The subject lacks notability. There is insufficient media coverage to create more than a stub. - Jehochman Talk 03:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 16:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Wiener's Circle[edit]
The page asserts notability, which I believe it hasn't got, so I have AfD'd it. An appearance on Dave Attell, doesn't mean notable. A google books search turned up only a few passing mentions and a web search turns up numerous advertising sites. The article lacks references for any of its assertions as well. IvoShandor 03:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was: Speedily deleted by Jimfbleak. - Mike Rosoft 12:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Ghouls Black Death[edit]
unsourced article about a nn album yet to be released by apparently nn group WP:CRYSTAL, WP:MUSIC and possible hoax.Carlossuarez46 02:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete--JForget 00:11, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Dimitriados street[edit]
Delete some streets in a mid-sized Greek town, with no independent notability and no sourcing.
Carlossuarez46 02:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Although I argued differently in the US malls AFD, there's a lack of consensus in this AFD, and the US malls AFD was closed as no consensus as well. There does not seem to be consensus for deleting these at this time. W.marsh 16:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] List of shopping malls in Thailand[edit]
Wikipedia is not a directory. Neither is it a collection of indiscriminate information. Notable malls can be found in the category. •97198 talk 01:48, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:20, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Karmyn tyler[edit]Looking carefully at this, I can't actually see any WP:Notability or reliable sources. She doesn't seem to satisfy WP:BIO in my eyes. What say you? Pigman 01:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete. After a reasonable time-frame, a renomination may be appropriate if issues are not addressed. Daniel 09:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Schlow Centre Region Library[edit]
Reason StateCollege101 01:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 00:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Sir Standish O'Grady Roche, 4th Baronet[edit]
unsourced one-line article about a ship's captain and minor nobility - is that notable? I don't think so. A redirect to the Roche Baronets might be ok, but as it looks now that article is basically a red-link farm, so delete is probably in order.Carlossuarez46 01:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Thomas & friends TOMY wind ups[edit]
Attempt (IMO) to run-around the earlier redirection at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Tomy Wind Ups. The consensus was clear; these shouldn't each have their own articles, and nothing has changed, but these articles tend to get recreated (as in the related AFD). Masaruemoto 01:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result wasKeep per Snow/Nomination Withdrawn - Non-Admin Closure . Fosnez 13:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Fat cats[edit]AfDs for this article:
The result was Withdrawn and redirected. Carlossuarez46 02:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] The Castle (1997 film)[edit]
Delete no notability, coverage, sources, fails WP:MOVIE Carlossuarez46 01:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete--Kubigula (talk) 22:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Qualitative and quantitative[edit]
Delete unsourced comparison of two dictionary definitions and how they may be used in chemistry Carlossuarez46 01:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disambigufy, per bikeable.--Victor falk 05:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per discussion. Unsourced (violates WP:RS), duplicative article, useful content already exists in two other articles. Bearian 21:46, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] List of USAF Intelligence Wings assgned to Strategic Air Command[edit]
Esoterically named, misspelt article that duplicates information at 544th Information Operations Group. Orphaned; unlikely to be helpful as a redirect title Buckshot06 12:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy deleted. -- Longhair\talk 01:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] The Screaming Secrets[edit]
Delete nn band and its founder.
The result was delete. PeaceNT 04:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] James Anthony Smith[edit]
Claims of notability are weak at best. No sources in article to show notability -- gsearch for James Smith + Sarasota + author don't come up with this James Smith in the first several pages. Also gsearch for either of the novels listed comes up empty. Contested prod. Fabrictramp 00:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete all. Kudos to the nominator for his work and finding a reasonable solution (transwiki) that respects Wikipedia's policies & guidelines. — Scientizzle 16:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Locations in the Lone Wolf series[edit]Also nominating the following;
These articles were part of my attempt to expand coverage of the Lone Wolf (gamebooks) series, and unfortunatelly, it was before I understood things like notability and out of universe perspective. These articles and their contents have all been transferred over to the Lone Wolf wiki at Wikia, so it is safe to get ride of them on wikipedia and redirect these pages to the main Lone wolf article, Lone Wolf (gamebooks). Judgesurreal777 00:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 16:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Okeke Nelson Malachy[edit]
Deletion nom This is a person who may or may not have been executed for drug trafficking. There is a single reference which says as much. A possibly convicted and possibly executed criminal is hardly enough notability to hang an entire Wikipedia article on. Jayron32|talk|contribs 00:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. There is no consensus to salt; some favor recreation, which would presumably make a redirect from this title appropriate. This content is deleted for massive original research and apparent POV issues. It should not be reposted. If, as some suggest, users would like to recreate this article, please start from scratch without the OR and advocacy that has marred this page. Cool Hand Luke 02:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Jews against zionism (2nd nomination)[edit]
WP:POV neologism. One cannot just take a phrase and lump together a bunch of tangentially related items and claim that it is an article. The term was only used in the past for a website that was deemed not notable, see both Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jews Against Zionism and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jews against zionism, not to mention Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jews Against Zionism (disambiguation). To me, it appears we have a person desperately trying to circumvent accepted policy, by any means necessary, to push a fringe POV and/or original research-based synthesis and neologism. If anything, there is grounds for calling for a Speedy Delete in this case. Avi 00:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 16:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Radio Free Texas[edit]
Delete Non-notable internet radio broadcast. Google gives "Radio Free Texas" 56 hits none of which seem to include reliable sources to confer its notability. Maybe even speedy since it doesn't even assert that it is notable NightRider63 01:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 16:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Split Infinity Radio[edit]
The result was delete as a copyvio. No prejudice against recreation in non-copyvio form W.marsh 16:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Jubilee House Community[edit]appears to lack notability. βcommand 04:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PeaceNT 04:54, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Red Lion Foundry[edit]
non-notable company. google only 100 hits [57] Sfji00 05:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 16:19, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Social effects of United States military forces based in the United Kingdom[edit]
Malformed AFD from August. BirgitteSB 16:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC) (categories)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 16:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Spark-l-eyed wobbler[edit]Non-notable fishing lure. BirgitteSB 16:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Skateboarding in Barcelona[edit]Article was created to promote a website. Original article Spam link was removed since then but the article is still not a notable topic for Wikipedia. BirgitteSB 17:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a useful topic, however it belongs on Wikibooks, so delete. John Vandenberg 09:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Transcribing English to Japanese[edit]Instruction manual which has been imported to Wikibooks. BirgitteSB 17:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Article content afoul of the no original research policy. --Aarktica 23:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Team killer[edit]Completely original research. Talk page discussion concludes that there are no reliable sources for this concept. BirgitteSB 17:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PeaceNT 04:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Science fiction and fantasy[edit]This is just an essay and not really any kind of an encyclopedic article. I can't see how to begin sourcing an opinion piece like this which makes me think it doesn't belong here at all.BirgitteSB 17:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was deleted by User:Citicat PeaceNT 04:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] East Coast Resurrection[edit]
Future album in violation of WP:CRYSTAL Will (talk) 21:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per WP:CRYSTAL. KrakatoaKatie 19:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Angels of Destruction[edit]
Future album in violation of WP:CRYSTAL Will (talk) 21:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per WP:CRYSTAL. KrakatoaKatie 19:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Cheri Dennis' Debut Album[edit]AfDs for this article:
Future album in violation of WP:CRYSTAL Will (talk) 21:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per WP:CRYSTAL. KrakatoaKatie 17:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Dive Deep (Morcheeba album)[edit]
Future album that presents no sources of existence Will (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per WP:CRYSTAL. KrakatoaKatie 17:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Godz Plan[edit]Future album that presents no sources of existence Will (talk) 21:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per WP:CRYSTAL. KrakatoaKatie 17:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Homeland (album)[edit]
Future album that presents no sources of existence Will (talk) 21:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per WP:CRYSTAL. KrakatoaKatie 16:59, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] I Found Beauty[edit]
Future album that presents no sources of existence Will (talk) 21:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per WP:CRYSTAL. KrakatoaKatie 17:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Identity (Raghav album)[edit]
Future album that presents no sources of existence Will (talk) 21:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per WP:CRYSTAL. KrakatoaKatie 17:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Killer (Tech N9ne album)[edit]
Future album that presents no sources of existence Will (talk) 21:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete per WP:CRYSTAL. KrakatoaKatie 17:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Live 2 Tell (Original Soundtrack)[edit]
Future album that presents no sources of existence (except for IMDB, which is unreliable) Will (talk) 21:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 16:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply] Live 1969[edit]Future album that presents no sources of existence Will (talk) 21:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
|