< October 8 | October 10 > |
---|
The result was merge to Everyones Internet. The naming of the resulting article can be decided once the merge is complete.
Web host company fails WP:CORP, was tagged speedy as advertising, but seems just short of blatant on that score. Carlossuarez46 23:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete--JForget 00:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Inherently unverifiable article about a state that does not yet exist, that is supposed to come about as a result of a referendum that has not yet even been scheduled to take place. Russ (talk) 23:48, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alleged "philosophical concept" but skirts around defining it. Probable hoax. At best non-notable. -- RHaworth 23:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 00:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nomination; I've just removed a ((prod)) on this ("Non-notable group, with no sources. PRODed once before... but seems to have gone..."), as this is clearly inaccurate; a brief google-skim shows over 60,000 hits, including plenty of apparent reliable sources. I'm about to go off for six days and am very unlikely to have time to expand/rescue this before the prod expires, so bringing it over here to let someone else check the sources and see if this actually is expandable/rescuable. (Incidentally, the "prodded once before" is inaccurate - there's nothing in the deletion log & no deleted edits in the history.) Despite my procedurally nominating this for deletion, I (provisionally pending checking of the apparent sources) !vote keep. — iridescent (talk to me!) 23:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BIO as never having played in a fully professional league. The article states that he's played in the FA Cup, but there are many amateur players that play in the FA Cup every year. If he does play in a professional league, the article can be recreated. Delete until then. robwingfield «T•C» 23:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 00:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article lacks sufficient sources to argue notability for the person. (Please recall that a high number of published documents and search engine hits do not constitute notability.) After a brief review of a biography posted to Wikipedia, which was removed due to copyright reasons, it does not appear that this person has significantly contributed to this field. However, this is my view of it, others may differ. If there are additional sources, not by the subject himself, that provide evidence of notability, perhaps this article is worthwhile. As it stands, there is not enough information. Additionally, the article has been online for some time without any new (legal) information added to the page. — Chris53516 (Talk) 23:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. --Coredesat 02:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BIO as never having played in a fully professional league. If he does play in a professional league, the article can be recreated. Delete until then. robwingfield «T•C» 23:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Zomboo gets fewer than 2,000 Google hits, of which under 150 are unique. It looks, from a read around the net, as if "on the air" is actually mainly on the internet. This article, in as much as it rises above the level of a directory entry, almost makes it to the status of a bad advertisement. It has never had any sources. Cruftbane 23:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a directory of listcruft. Corvus cornix 23:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 18:51, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BIO as never having played in a fully professional league. If he does play in a professional league, the article can be recreated. Delete until then. robwingfield «T•C» 23:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ok well true this player has never played a professional league game, although he plays for a league team, and im sure if you go though a few of the fringe players and young players who signed contracts for this season, you will probably find they havn't actually played a professional league game either, so why don't you have a little look though all them as well, seen as you have nothing better to do, oh your a man of steel on wikipedia ain't you, the deleting articles man "Robwingfield", you should get a life me old mucka, oh well at least the Ludovic Quistin article will continue to remain as it should, enjoy your deletions important man. Stew jones 23:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If the Conference League is not fully professional (and I'm not sure of this), he fails WP:BIO and should be deleted, as that is the highest league in which he has played a game. It'd be funny though if he went on to represent England and this AfD discussion was brought up... --Mkativerata 23:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep although this player has not "yet" made an appearance for Bury, I'm sure it is only a short matter of time before he does. Is there any point in deleting off a page that will be restored in a few weeks... come on guys, surely you've got better things to be doing with your lifes... well I hope so anyway! Jonesy702 17:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"one of the more acclaimed producers in the hip hop music music industry" at the age of 19, doesn't seem likely. No reliable sources. Corvus cornix 22:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 00:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pure original research - there's certainly potential for a valid, sourced article to be written on the character, but not a scene-by-scene CliffsNotes analysis. — iridescent (talk to me!) 22:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a group project for a college course. We are not even finished with it. There are more in depth things to come. The Act by act section just highlights his action in the play and there are comments in it on his character as well.Shakespearesister 23:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Beloved radiologist, but still just a radiologist, despite the huge amount of fangushing in the article. Corvus cornix 22:40, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete - Obvious soapboxing/personal essay - previously deleted and this AFD was previously closed. Mr.Z-man 02:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I'd nominate this rather than add a speedy tag because it does offer some interesting information but I don't believe it's worthy of an article by itself and should perhaps be merged with Nigeria RyanLupin (talk/contribs) 22:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per CSD A1, A7, G11, and probably some others. Stifle (talk) 20:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Self-promotional article about a non-notable comic. Article states that the comic will be self-published in the future--Dark Matter Comics (since speedied) is also the author's own creation. Prod was removed by author with no explanation other than "updated info". --Finngall talk 22:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per non-notable, and seems to advertising for a self-made comic. Thanks, Codelyoko193 TalkSign here 22:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect Mountain View Elementary School (Nanaimo) to School District 68 Nanaimo-Ladysmith and all others to School District 22 Vernon. John254 00:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable school. The article doesn't even really contain any encyclopedic information. Rjd0060 22:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason (NN & little context):
- Rjd0060 22:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, as non-notable. Thanks, Codelyoko193 TalkSign here 22:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete all. I live in British Columbia, home to all these schools, and have never heard of any of them. I checked to see that the alternative schools were not in the vicinity of a recent local scandal about polygamy; not AFAIK. Perfectly ordinary non-notable schools. Accounting4Taste 23:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Initially prodded article was restored on request, but notability concerns are obvious (a science fiction fanclub), and the article is lacking sources to establish that this is more than a run-of-the-mill club. Sent here to let the community investigate and decide. trialsanderrors 22:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Extremely borderline notability. Nominating per a thread on ANI. Yes, he has a grammy nomination, but that was an engineer... do we have articles for every sound engineer on every Grammy nominated album(s)? I recuse from this one, as I simply don't know enough about what is notable for back-end music technicians like this.
NOTE: User:Ryanwestmusic, who appears to be Ryan West, made the article and worked a lot on it. • Lawrence Cohen 22:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how to add my two cents here, but here goes. I am a mixing engineer and record producer with plenty credible references on the web. Whether Wikipedia decides that because I'm not famous outside of the music business I don't deserve a blurb or two, I'm non-plussed. What space does it take up? 300kb? I could list a whole bunch of stuff that in some people's eyes, would be enough for an article. I've been interviewed by Scratch, Remix and Mix magazine. I was on VH1's White Rapper Show. I am currently producing my cousin, Lady Miss Kier of Deeelite. I have two Grammy nominations....yes nominations, not wins, however I was nominated and attended. I have hundreds of products on the market with my name and creative input on them. You may not give engineer/mixers much credit, but I think that's a mistake. Besides, who in the heck said you must be famous to be listed here? I mean, I've seen listings for CEOs of middle of the road corporations. Where's the priority here? Like I said, either way, I'm non-plussed, but let's be clear here. My listing has been plagued by jerk-faced pranksters. I'm not sure how I became the target of that crap, but I can assure you it's made me weary of this whole thing. Sorry for the dissertation, but how's a guy supposed to feel? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.97.172 (talk) 01:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Consensus is that the article is an inappropriate content fork. -- Jreferee t/c 22:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant POV fork of development of religion. Partially consists of edits rejected by the wiki process from related topics. Redirect to Development of religion. Vassyana 22:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is in violation of WP:NOT#INFO whose only criteria for inclusion is the appearance of an airline, for even a single second (such as Aeroflot in Bourne Supremacy), in film, music video, etc. Russavia 22:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable footballer. Not at a professional club and with no professional appearances. (Contested Prod) ArtVandelay13 21:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. -- Longhair\talk 22:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is not an organisation of any kind, it may exist at some point in the future, but looks unlikely. I'm putting it to AfD as I'm really not sure enough to speedy/prod it, and think the community may have more information than I do. Orderinchaos 21:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Further discussions and comments sould be posted on the article's talk page. VoL†ro/\/Force 02:38, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not really sure if this belongs on Wikipedia, seems like a dictionary definition. Leaning more towards delete, but a transwiki to Wiktionary is also a possibility Rackabello 21:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per CSD:A7. Stifle (talk) 20:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable under-18 football club. Corvus cornix 21:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge and redirect to American Wrestling Federation. KrakatoaKatie 20:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. NN, also fails WP:Bio Endless Dan 20:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged in February as failing notability guidelines, no independent sources have ever been included to support the rather tenuous claim of notability. Created by TinaChong (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who has no other contributions before or since, save to link this to a high-level article on editorial cartooning. The entire thing appears to be original research and the subject does not appear to be notable. Cruftbane 20:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable neologism. Google notes 4 instances of use, excluding wikipedias. Deltopia 20:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 00:29, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(View AfD)
See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Songs of All Time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamaliel (talk • contribs) 17:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The articles are a magnet for POV, OR and vandalism, and mostly consist of a top 10 list and a hunk of unsourced trivia and analysis. As well, there are no sources that prove their significance. There was a similar article for the 100 Greatest Guitarists that was deleted roughly a year ago. The AFD can be found for that here. At the very least, the pages should be merged into the Rolling Stone article. Scorpion0422 20:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete, including the category and the template. --Coredesat 02:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Incomplete and redundant now we have Category:Compositions by composer Centy – reply• contribs – 20:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Claims of notability, so I didn't immediately list it for speedy deletion, but there are only 19 Google hits for "George hakun". There are no entries at artistidrect.com or allmusic.com. Corvus cornix 20:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:23, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant hoax - 0 ghits on either Scentarians or Leminicies. This reads suspiciously like someone transcribing part of an RPG. "Hoax" isn't a speedy criteria, and not quite nonsense enough for a G1 — iridescent (talk to me!) 20:40, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. KrakatoaKatie 20:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable bio of local TV personality Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 20:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. KrakatoaKatie 20:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable bio of local TV personality Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 20:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Already speedied once under the name Chase evans, and an apparent clear COI - sole contributor: Chaseevans (talk · contribs). Bringing it over here to get a once-and-for-all decision on whether this passes WP:PORNBIO or not. Procedural nom, so I abstain. — iridescent (talk to me!) 20:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
why would you delete it --Chaseevans 22:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete Hasn't been around long enough yet to satisfy WP:PORNBIO. Borderline spam.--Sethacus 05:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence that this radio presenter meets Wikipedia:Notability. Page appears to be a copy-and-paste of his personal website, with only slight changes of text. Could be speedily deleted as blatant advertising, but I've taken this to Articles for Deletion just in case. At the moment though, there is little credible evidence to suggest he meets WP:BIO or WP:NOTE. Solumeiras talk 20:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:29, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Another unremarkable rapper. Speedy was declined on the basis of claiming to have a smash hit, "Let Me In". Attempting to search for his smash hit yields very minimal results, and none of them appear reliable. None of his mixtapes or albums check out either. Probably an autobiography, but I have no evidence of this. Bongwarrior 19:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep, nomination withdrawn. KrakatoaKatie 20:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article's creator and only major contributor User:Airshipman is a representative of Airship Management Services, Inc., possibly even George Spyrou himself. This is quite clear in the source descriptions of images this user uploaded. See Special:Contributions/Airshipman Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 19:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was good grief, delete, delete. --Coredesat 02:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No notability asserted. Creator worked only on this article. Probable spam Lenticel (talk) 19:48, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was closed as keep due to nominator withdrawing his nom. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 16:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article's creator and only major contributor User:Airshipman is a representative of Airship Management Services, Inc. This is quite clear in the source descriptions of images this user uploaded. See Special:Contributions/Airshipman. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 19:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:33, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No indication that this radio presenter meets the standards for notability of people, or that he even meets notability policy. No reliable third-party sources that assert notability either (references to him removed from radio station websites). Solumeiras talk 19:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Metroid (series). KrakatoaKatie 20:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Articles already exist for each of these games. There is no reason why they should be rehashed here. DurinsBane87 19:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There has been consensus that artists who've only released one album don't need a separate discography page. 17Drew 18:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. W.marsh 15:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Was spam for a kind of eBay intermediary in India; once all corporate references removed, this became a bunch of original research that seems confused about what it's trying to define. Accounting4Taste 18:45, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Completely unsourced list of occasions someone has used the number 666. This is listcruft and unencyclopedic. We don't need "popular culture references" sections in every article. B 18:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 18:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Probably non notable company. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 18:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete No assertion of notability. Improbcat 18:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This fails WP:NOT#DIR to the letter. Wikipedia is not a list KoshVorlon ".. We are ALL Kosh..." 18:06, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly non notable company, created by an account with no contribs except those to this article and a product of InQuira. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 18:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of notability. Improbcat 18:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deletion as part of a series of nonsense/attack articles created by one editor.--Ed (Edgar181) 18:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dictionary definition, looks like a hoax or similar. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 17:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was withdrawn. —David Eppstein 06:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable bio of local TV personality Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 17:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw the nomination, I didn't read carefully enough.
The result was Keep. GDonato (talk) 20:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Notability has not been proven, since the article (still) has no third party sources, relying solely on the one primary source(org's website. Sfacets 11:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 15:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
web/inernet neologism SYSS Mouse 17:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. W.marsh 15:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable bio of local newscaster Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 17:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I Need Help - since I'm not experienced enough, I don't know how to withdraw this and resubmit it as a CSD. I just viewed the log and discovered that this was previously deleted - speedily - for copyvio G12. Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 18:06, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 15:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable biography of local TV personality Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 16:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Consensus is that the topic does not meet the general notability guidelines. Other than the three SPAs participating in the discussion, Accounting4Taste did list a reference, that Jayron32 rebutted as being a non Wikipedia reliable source. The article listed twelve references, none of which is linked to the article text or gives any indication of containing information about Rocket World. The twelve references were not relied up in this discussion to show that the topic met WP:N and were dismissed by the delete discussion. -- Jreferee t/c 23:17, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion nomination Contested speedy. Article is about a non-notable corporation per WP:CORP. The article claims that the company is a notable one in the world of designer vinyl toys. While some sources have been added, these are all about the industry of designer vinyl toys in general, and NO evidence has been presented which indicates that this company is notable within that industry. Jayron32|talk|contribs 16:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus to delete. Can't merge and delete, the edit history must be preserved. But merge/redirect is possible, and doesn't require AFD. W.marsh 20:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure a TV show with only one episode so far doesn't need a separate article for an episode list. Recommend merge and delete. shoy 16:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 15:53, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This club does not seem to exist in the Brighton Hove and District Football League Premier Division. A quick check in this web page shows that the existence of this club is difficult to verify and non-existent. Moreover, it is not even a level 11 (or Step 7) club of the English football league system and thus have concerns over notability issues as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 16:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PeaceNT 02:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A semiprofessional footballer who has never played a league game for his club Moglex 17:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. W.marsh 18:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Henderson doesn't meet the notability guidelines. His only claim to "fame" seems to be self-publishing two books and being involved in a couple of lawsuits. SandyHand 15:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy keep. AfD seems to be only to make a point. Espresso Addict 18:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article has no sources, also Dead black males has been nominated for deletion. Erwin Morland 01:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 15:40, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:SPORT. This person doesn't meet Notability sports for basketball, notability for amateur sports. He isn't in any professional team, no awards, no media attention from any nationally recognized media organizations (cnn, espn, etc.). Fails WP:BIO minimum requirements threshold. Does not meet general inclusion. No awards or honors, no significant recognized events or coverage of this person, doesn't appear in mainstream media (cnn, fox, radio, espn). Also doesn't meet criteria for "additional criteria", hasn't performed professional league or equivalent, hasn't performed in highest level of amature level (college NCAA). The person doesn't appear in top 10 list of Google search Derrick Rose basketball - 6etonyourfeet (talk?) 23:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:06, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I created article with wrong name (should be "National Healthy Mothers Healthy Babies Coalition.") Additionally, it looks like this is a fishery-industry-backed non-profit of little significance except for their one marketing attempt at trying to get pregnant women/mothers to eat more fish than otherwise reccomended. [23] --Zeke pbuh 18:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep: the objection (being redlink-only DAB page) has been removed. Mukadderat 17:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation page that contins only red links. Your Grace Lord Sir Dreamy of Buckland tm 20:12, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 15:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion nomination This is a non-notable song. Article shows no evidence that this song has any independant notability besides the artist that recorded it, the album it appears on, and the song it samples (incorrectly identified, I might add. The song by Steely Dan is "Kid Charlemagne"). Since this song lacks any independant notability, the article should be either deleted or redirected to the artist who performs it or album it appears on. Jayron32|talk|contribs 15:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It describes the song. What's the problem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by HLyford11 (talk • contribs) 07:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Neil ☎ 09:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not a family in need of a seperate article, an infobox similar to the Hart family may be a better way of connecting the articles. Information from this page should be worked into the main articles. Darrenhusted 15:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Nobody has produced an argument to defend the rank OR problems with this article. Given the keep comments are all (bar one) "per Bikeable", who subsequently changed his argument to "merge", there is little in favour of keeping. And Gandalf61's argument is not convincing. Asserting something is not OR but failing to provide any evidence to back up that assertion is never convincing. Consensus - rooted in policy - is clearly to not retain this article. None of Wiktionary, Wikisaurus or Wikibooks would accept this as they do not want original research, so a transwiki is out (other wikiprojects are not our dumping grounds). There are already examples on the Snowclones article, so I don't think a merge is necessary, although I will userfy this article should someone really want some further examples in there (I would strongly suggest you'd be better finding referenced ones elsewhere, if any exist). Neil ☎ 09:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One big original research. The term "snowclone" is itself a frest 4-year old neologism, and this list is an unreferenced collection of things that fit the neologism, i.e., it is a wikipedian's conclusion taht they constitune slowclone, i.e., it is original research `'Míkka 05:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and reference better --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 02:43, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. It had been redirected, but the redirect is orphaned and probably not useful in the long run. --Coredesat 02:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia is not IMDB. There is no encyclopedic value in a list of actors who have appeared on a particular soap opera and another soap opera. Otto4711 14:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus for Disinformation (art and music project) and Delete Rorschach Audio . Electronic voice phenomena (EVPs) are sometimes referred to as "Rorschach audio," after the psychological test in which subjects read their own interpretation of inkblot images.[25] This provides confusion with the research artwork topic run by "Disinformation." Consensus is that the topic for Rorschach Audio lacks source material that is independent of control of the the group Disinformation to meet general notability guidelines. Regarding Disinformation (art and music project), the article lists many references, none of which is connected to the text in the article. However, there was little to no discussion on the merits of each of the article listed references in the context of whether there was sufficient reliable source material, independent of Disinformation, to maintain a Wikipedia article on the topic. Ignoring the SPAs, the discussion was not clear as to whether Disinformation (art and music project) met general notability guidelines. -- Jreferee t/c 00:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Two audio art projects of dubious notability which came to my attention after revert warring over whether they should be nominated for speedy deletion. There is a notability claimed but it is in some fairly obscure sources. No vote from me. Sam Blacketer 14:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. This naturally does not preclude cleanup and merge proposals on the talk page. Cool Hand Luke 00:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Page discussed at a prior AFD, with a poor quality discussion. After deletion, DRV discussion resulted in overturning the decision for this relisting. While my nomination is technical, I opine below. GRBerry 13:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. W.marsh 15:43, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Unremarkable person -- not suitable for CSD. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 13:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 15:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable theatre group. No WP:SOURCES, fails WP:V and WP:N Rackabello 13:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable fansite, vaguely asserts notability. Alexa rank is 89498. MER-C 12:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apparent vanity/advertising piece; not speedying/prodding, as a google search does show some hits in Hebrew, so it may be possible for a Hebrew-speaker to source & improve this. Nothing in English-language sources I can see to expand this from. — iridescent (talk to me!) 12:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable minor aspect of an advertising campaign. Article is essentially unverifiable, with about 20 ghits. I think it's pretty safe to say that nobody cares. MER-C 12:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - prod removed by WIkistalker without explanation. This is an article on an essay written by a non-notable person about a non-notable person published in a non-notable journal. In other words, fails WP:N. Otto4711 12:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:COATRACK -- Additionally, it doesn't have one non-wikipedia+mirror google hit. I didn't expect many because it claims to be an essay published in a journal but I expected atleast one. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 13:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete all a7, positive assertion of nonnotability: "The truth about Rhiannan T. is that she is not very well known. So she won't be able to be searched on the internet at all, because of that reason ." (from Rhiannan Teret Truth). NawlinWiki 14:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Unverifiable WP:BLP. No WP:RS provided. Possible hoax or vanity-spam. Evb-wiki 12:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related page because it is unverifiable and no WP:RS is provided:
The result was redirect. W.marsh 15:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think this article fails WP:MUSIC and WP:NOTABILITY. I couldn't find any good evidence that this song was released at all. See here, Evermore's official site doesn't even list this song as a released single! A search in Google and Sanity (online Australian music store) fails to produce any results. — *Hippi ippi 11:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WP:CRYSTAL. PeaceNT 02:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Day 74 is a First Person Shooter rumoured to be in development at Starbreeze Studios. This is however not true, Starbreeze Studios is currently not involved in this production." My crystal ball predicts the deletion of this unsourced and unverified article. MER-C 11:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"The term "ecotarian" is relatively new and has not been noticeably appropriated into any popular cultural, economic, medical, or scientific context." Yep, indeed. MER-C 10:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was deletified. --Coredesat 03:03, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An article on various related neologisms. No evidence of widespread use beyond the original NYTimes article, compare google:FEMAfied, google:FEMAfication and google:FEMArati. MER-C 10:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g7, see below, moving other game page back to this title. NawlinWiki 19:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non notable future game made as a school project with no reliable sources. Another future game, Subversion by Introversion Software, which IS notable, was moved without any discussion from this page by the creator of this new article. Darksun 10:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rjd0060 14:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Mile92 15:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wrapper 15:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If assistance is needed with the transwiki process, please feel free to contact me. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nomination. Expired prod with rationale
I'd rather see this go through AfD. Pascal.Tesson 10:18, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:V, WP:OR and WP:N. Creator acknowledged at RFF that it is based entirely on his own experience. Adrian M. H. 10:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 15:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This person is not notable; see only two Google hits. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 09:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Single-event biography. Could not find any evidence that subject is notable outside his death. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. MER-C 09:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PeaceNT 02:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Smells like some new idea by a fashion designer that hasn't caught on. Google fails to bring up anything useful. MER-C 09:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WjBscribe 03:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NOTABILITY and WP:MUSIC. I couldn't find a reliable source that describes the release of this song. The article mentioned that the release was confirmed by www.dailystar.co.uk, but I could not find anything in the site that confirms the release. Here are the Daily Star article search results for 'Sugababes' [29] — *Hippi ippi 09:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just another Facebook extension. There is nothing to suggest that this is in any way more notable than the other 4500 extensions out there (see, e.g. these 319 ghits). MER-C 08:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This "disambiguation" page was the subject of a prod. Its talk page reflects solid proof why it does not deserve to exist because it does not "disambiguate" between any articles but only links to outside dubious websites, violating WP:NOT#LINK and WP:NOT#WEBSPACE and WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. It also seems to have been created to get around deletion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Torah Jews. See Talk:Jews Against Zionism (disambiguation) for full discussion about problems, especially as noted by User:MPerel that "jewsagainstzionism.org is registered to Roland Rance and is a small secular group. The registration gives a contact address in London. It redirects to Jews Against Zionism. jewsagainstzionism.com is registered privately and anonymously via 3rd party GoDaddy.com and its ownership is therefore unknown and unverifiable. The unverifiable and anonymous jewsagainstzionism.com site is often confused with jewsnotzionists.com, the latter which is registered to Yisroel Weiss." And User:zzuuzz has stated: "This page was recently prod-deleted and restored. Until very recently it would have been a speedy deletion candidate, and it probably still is. Disambiguation pages serve to disambiguate between articles with potentially the same name. Here, there are no articles, not even one. I have no doubt this page would be deleted at AfD, and I'm slightly bemused as to why a restoration was requested. Is it going to start disambiguating articles, or shall we take a waltz through AfD?" This also violates WP:NOT#SOAPBOX. It is also bound to be a POV magnet. IZAK 08:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WjBscribe 03:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This film fails WP:NF. The only secondary source given is a review on a minor web magazine, while the guideline calls e.g. for "full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics". PROD was contested with comment: "passes other markers of notability, several notable stars / celebrities appear in the movie". I actually don't see for which notable person this film was a major part of their career; but if so, a merger could be considered. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 08:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--Victor falk 08:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Amazon editorial review: This attempt to elevate a skateboard video to an action-adventure film nearly makes MTV's Jackass look like Masterpiece Theater...
The result was Keep. Consensus is that the topic meets the general notability guidelines. -- Jreferee t/c 01:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is heavily promotional in tone, fails to cite any independent sources, and is linked to very few other artilces. Google shows just under 1,000 hits, among which I did not spot anything that would be useful as a source. Even though his cabaret career "blossomed" in 1983, and he has an "unusually smooth baritone voice" (lucky chap) I could not find any non-trivial independent sources from which to rewrite the article. Cruftbane 07:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted by Lectonar. MER-C 09:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
this article is blatant advt for a company. the afd tag has been removed due to Bad faith Mugunth 06:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete. Page was re-created after previous nom (above), hence the double nomination. Page already deleted by: User:NawlinWiki. Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 15:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article seems to be of a non-notable company. The speedy deletion tag has been contested so I've just decided to nominate it for AFD. Wikidudeman (talk) 13:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable fighter, unreferenced Thesaddestday 05:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. John254 00:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A speedy deletion via AFD in July; a user asked for the deletion to be overturned. I believe an argument for keeping the page is forthcoming; I have no opinion. Ral315 » 04:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm currently editing the article to better express Stein's accomplishments/notability, and to cite sources. When done, I'll drop another note here. I hope it's all right to ask that the discussion wait a bit (an hour or two) for those changes to be done. --Karl Fogel 05:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've had a go at fleshing out the article with some more information and references. Comments/improvements welcome. Note that one of the references is a book I wrote -- I didn't do that out of egotism, it's just that it's a published source and is an appropriate reference for a factual statement in the article. I'm not sure what the etiquette is around citations like that. I'm happy to be educated, though; just let me know what the usual procedure is. Thanks. --Karl Fogel 06:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was reply hazy, try again. Please re-list seperately where it may be appropriate to do so. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OUTCOMES says that while high schools are kept, middle and elementary schools aren't. J-ſtanTalkContribs 04:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. PeaceNT 02:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There does seem to be press on this group but much of the early Ghits seem to be from the same press release. I'm having trouble satisfying WP:RS and WP:V in my searches. I'm willing to admit to a mistake on this nom if others can find more info. Pigman 03:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC) ALSO: There seems to be considerable conflict of interest since the sole editor of the article is named after the manager and brother of a band member. Just sayin'... Pigman 03:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Hoax, Speedied. humblefool® 04:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Best-seller" that apparently doesn't exist, zero Google hits but notability was asserted. Also apparently written ten years in the future. Accounting4Taste 03:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as hoax. DS 15:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article has no references or sources, there is no mention of the incident on the Internet - except for Wikipedia and it's mirrors and the original author has made no other edits except for the creation of this article. This, in addition to the comment left on the talk page, by the party who had originally written to OTRS - lead me to believe the article is a hoax. Versageek 03:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article appears to violate WP:OR. It has no relaiable references. It returns zero hits on google scholar, which is suggestive, even if not a complete guide. User:John Talbot, who started the article, also seems to be the main person promoting the idea. For example, he wrote: "It is for this reason that I proposed some years ago the use of the word panocracy. Pan meaning everyone so panocracy is rule by everyone" on [42] on 2006-06-20 12:17, and seems to be the main author of the site promoting this idea [43]. Of course, I could be missing something, so I hope someoen with better knowledge of this field will examine this article. Anarchia 03:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Carol Moore 02:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)User:Carolmooredc User talk:Carolmooredc
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deltion nomination Too broad to be useful, not only unreferenced but likely unreferencable, wikipedia is not a directory, no criteria for inclusion beyond "Japanese". Jayron32|talk|contribs 03:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Consensus is that Pixelism as an art movement topic does not meet the general notability guidelines. -- Jreferee t/c 01:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fun one here. This claims to be an art movement. At first I thought this was an elaborate hoax, but it isn't, as at least one genuine artist does seem to call one of his works a "pixelism" [45]. Other artists may produce work in this style [46], but do not call it pixelism that i can tell. The article gives 3 references, which actually do seem to exist [47] but again do not mention the term "pixelism" as far as I can tell. Then, I can't find anything else confirming this is a genuine art movement... [48] [49]. So until there are sources confirming the claims of this article, I think needs to be deleted for failing WP:V and possibly WP:NOR. --W.marsh 03:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete (patent nonsense). CitiCat ♫ 02:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't even know what this would fail! The first half talks about wikipedia administrators, then goes on to discuss the element Carbon. They aren't even remotely linked. ARendedWinter 01:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus - Being verifiable, indiscriminate, and notable are not issues for this list, because the content is verifiable, follows a clear theme, and can be sourced. Consensus regarding these issues is clear. However, just because the fact that Arby's and the other restaurants on the list are fast food restaurants and that fact can be sourced and verified does not address the real issues of this particlar list. The issue that needs to be the focus of any future AfD discussion is list vs. category and whether this list meets any of the three main list purposes. There was some discussion on these, but not enough to produce a clear consensus, in part because of the distraction of whether the list was verifiable, indiscriminate, or notable. -- Jreferee t/c 00:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This page is very long and seems to be list of every single fast food restraunt known notable or not. The page is basicly a collection of Internal and External Links mixed in and violates these policys and Guidlines: WP:SOAP, WP:NOT#LINK,WP:LINKS, and possibly WP:DIRECTORY Sawblade05 (talk to me | my wiki life) 01:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Farscape. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A fictional spaceship. Prod tags removed. No sources, no real world notability. To my mind, it is not very interesting even within the show. Previous debates have revealed a hard core of Farscape editors, who argue furiously for the retention of Farscape articles but never actually add citations to back up their claims. SolidPlaid 01:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete and redirect to Yorktown Heights, New York. --Coredesat 03:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, also delete per WP:OUTCOMES. şœśэїŝәқιᅥṱᾅἻқᅡ 01:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do individual malls that are not otherwise notable meet WP:N? I wasn't aware that they did. Thoughts? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 00:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[58], [59], [60], [61], [62]. Tim Q. Wells 04:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete.. No notability. CitiCat ♫ 03:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alleged internet phenomenon. Unreferenced. No links! No assertion of notability. -- RHaworth 00:40, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PeaceNT 02:06, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article has no real-world significance. Belongs in a game guide, not an encyclopedia. Calliopejen1 00:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Whether it may become notable in the future is irrelevant to now, and keep/merge arguments seem to emphasize "possible" future notability for the school or one of its teachers (which wouldn't make the whole school meet WP:N. It can be recreated if it ever does. --Coredesat 03:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, delete per WP:OUTCOMES. şœśэїŝәқιᅥṱᾅἻқᅡ 00:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually that's incorrect, you need to go to the sub-sub categories, it gets pretty dispersed. You can see it better by using the Special:CategoryTree. For example, Category:Middle schools in the United States leads to Category:Middle schools in California which has over 200 entries. I don't know how if there is some wiki-way to quickly sum up the total of entries in a category and all it's sub-categories, but it would be helpful. Note also Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools seems to have no such distinction for preferring High schools but deleting elementary and middle schools. Arthurrh 01:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to display my ignorance on this, but I've just recently wandered into the schools area of wikipedia because of searching for vandals. I can't seem to tell what the notability criteria is for schools. What's discussed above certainly doesn't agree with the schools wikiproject. Either a lot of articles are being kept that should be deleted, or the reverse is happening. Arthurrh 01:40, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FYI a sum of all entries underneath the "Middle schools" category is 1670. (see list of Middle schools categories) This is somewhat inflated as I believe it also includes the sub-category names, but it is close. Obviously Middle schools are not an automatic deletion. Arthurrh 02:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I keep seeing this "Middle schools are usually deleted" but the fact that there are over 1500 of them seems to contradict this. Arthurrh 03:59, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(Bravo ex rel. Ramirez v. Hsu) regarding privilege to search students, but the case isn't cited by any others. – Zedla 06:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pasquerilla Spiritual Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD) StateCollege 00:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was already speedily deleted by User:NawlinWiki per WP:CSD#G12. Non-admin closure. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 01:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No claim of notability. Nowhere near meeting Wikipedia:Notability (books). Was told it can't be speedied, so it's here Drdisque 00:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article deleted per CSD#g12. This should be closed. -Rjd0060 01:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PeaceNT 02:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non Notable actress. Has only acted in 2 movies in which she played some small roles. See IMDB for her details. WriterListener 01:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge the appropriate content to List of Nintendo 64 games. Sandstein 07:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Despite Floppydog66's reasons given on the article's talk page, I fail to see how a seperate list from List of Nintendo 64 games is useful even to otaku such as myself. Such specialized interest is served better at the Japanese Wiki.SeizureDog 06:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Delete We already have a list of N64 games. I do not see the point to have only a list of Japanese games. Carlosguitar 08:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Floppydog66 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding ((subst:Smile)) to their talk page with a friendly message.
The result was delete. PeaceNT 02:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a game guide. Also fails WP:N; I've played all of the main Warcraft games and don't remember a single item from any of them. I'm assuming this is all WoW-cruft. SeizureDog 07:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete. CSD:G4 Recreation of deleted material. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Torah Jews. Avi 14:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable Zionist organization. Its references are all located on someone's user page. -- Luigi30 (Taλk) 14:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]