The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus, article underwent an extensive rewrite throughout the course of this AfD. Deathphoenix ʕ 04:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

slang term for sexual intercourse, apparently created just to link some spam page. It should be a redirect bogdan 07:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this might fly on wiktionaryurbandictionary, but not here. -- stubblyhead | ^T/_c 07:31, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is simply a slang dictionary entry that does not appear to be able to be enlarged into an article. Ande B 07:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I just took another look at the article page and then clicked on the link to the user page of OrangePeel, who created the page. I am now concerned that OrangePeel is engaged in some deliberately disruptive editing. He has removed all comments on his talk page regarding a number of other problems his editing has generated. His edits, at least at first glance, seem to focus on recategorizing various articles that relate to erotica or commercial sexual activity. I don't know if he is actually causing real problems or not but perhaps an admin might want to take a look at the pattern of strange edits and stranger replies he has left on other user's pages. (Will Beback's talk page comes to mind.) Ande B 08:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• keep, the deletion nomination is inaccurate. it is not a slang term, it is the term used for a specific act within the sex and massage industry. heres the link[1] and a stub has been added. individual who has nominated this article has harassed before. OrangePeel 13:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Fine, you acknowledge it is a term. Definitions of "terms" are not suitable for articles on WP. Definitions belong elsewhere. Ande B 14:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, slang dicdef. --Terence Ong 14:31, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above Hobbeslover 18:16, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:NOT a dictionary or usage guide of slang terms. I doubt a redirect would be appropriate, as the term is used far more widely for gas stations than for massage parlors or brothels. I'll check whether it's in Wiktionary, but I suspect it's already there and needs no transwikification. Barno 18:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. Caveat lector 19:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The article was totally rewritten and the votes above are not about the article in its current form. It is no longer about the sex act, but rather about the various ways full service is used. Vegaswikian 23:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply The page certainly is quite different at this time. Looks like a disambiguation page. Unfortunately, I'm not very familiar with WP policy regarding standards for disambiguation (even though I have created one!). Does this one currently comply with any disam standards? Ande B 23:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, it can not be a dab page since it is an article rather then a list of links to articles about the various forms of Full Service. I'd also add that if you look at the links to the articlem they are not about sex but mostly about broadcasting. I did not include broadcasting since I'm not sure what the term means in this case. Vegaswikian 23:33, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.