The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator and a refuted copyvio claim. I was almost tempted to close this "no consensus" considering that only one of the "keep" !votes is grounded in policy. (and yes I did notice that one editor !voted "keep" twice) (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Galloping Hogan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

totally non notable person. Google search shows no sourceable links to verify notability or the facts necessary for an article on him. Cat-five - talk 00:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - copyrighted material from [1]. Speedy tag added. --SharkxFanSJ (talk) 01:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • As far as I can determine, this is not a copyright violation (at least not on our side)—the servinghistory site extracts material from Wikipedia ([2]), not vice versa. Kirill ^{[talk] [prof]} 05:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note: Speedy was declined, tag removed, content restored. - Richard Cavell (talk) 00:06, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I can't see the text that this article is alleged to be plagiarised from. He'd be notable enough for an article. We could use this as a source. - Richard Cavell (talk) 04:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Did you even look at the link and the current article? The current article is someone who lived during 1690 and the article you linked is somebody who died in 2007. Please at least read what you're linking before posting it. Cat-five - talk 03:12, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • You're right. My source does not apply to the one the present article is about. Both of the Galloping Hogans would be notable. The copyvio claim is mistaken. Still keep. - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • Keep. I own the book , The Quest for the Galloping Hogan

by Matthew J Culligan-Hogan, ISBN 13: 9781884723001, ISBN 10: 1884723004 Hampton, Ct, U.S.A.: Tyrone Press, 1994 Publisher: Tyrone Press, Published Date: 1994 Spidernick (talk) 09:50, 204 July 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I added sources to this last week showing clear notability, including a whole book on the subject. Phil Bridger (talk) 06:21, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I own the book , The Quest for the Galloping Hogan by Matthew J Culligan-Hogan ISBN 9781884723001 ISBN 1884723004, Hampton, Ct, U.s.a.: Tyrone Press, 1994 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spidernick (talk • contribs) 17:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.