The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. SoWhy 11:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gamma Phi Circus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article holds no reliable sources whatsoever and purely relies on dead primary sources. Partially feels like an advertisment, but definetly fails WP:GNG/WP:CORPDEPTH (despite its age). The sourcing situation hasn't changed since the article's creation twelve years ago and thus should be deleted. Lordtobi (✉) 07:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fraternities and sororities-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:52, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:52, 25 April 2018 (UTC)*[reply]

• delete No significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG.Sandals1 (talk) 10:32, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.