The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. while it may be useful, consensus is that it's not notable. StarM 04:09, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Garmin eTrex

[edit]

Article is merely a sales catalog style definition of a product, fails WP:CATALOG Oscarthecat (talk) 23:03, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete It's an advertorial, no reliable sources, no notability. Make it speedy.Bali ultimate (talk) 03:08, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No suggestion on why this subject is notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Although a common device, I think the combination of the information in the main Garmin article and the List of Garmin products makes this article useless, on top of the fact that it's presumably original research, considering there are no sources whatsoever. ~Pip 2 andahalf 10:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to much like an advert (including pricing information which is meaningless in most of the world) or data sheet with no information on notability or references. MilborneOne (talk) 12:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep contains useful information Kyknos (talk) 07:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.