The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:34, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ghada Abdel Moneim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-promotional page written by the subject. All the references and external links are to self-published blogs and web sites and vague mentions of the subject on obscure Arabic language web sites and blogs. The ar.Wiki article used as a reference has been deleted FOUR times and remains deleted. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:ACADEMIC. Kudpung (talk) 09:32, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:GNG. I have tried to find sources for this article but was unable. Mo ainm~Talk 13:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for reasons mentioned here. The Arabic language version have been deleted multiple times and recreated by the same author. I bet that both User:41.131.87.137 and User:Ghada abdel moneim have the same IP adress. Rafy talk 18:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - non-notable. MalcolmMcDonald (talk) 09:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I write and read Arabic and I check all links its OK and she is a famous person in Egypt and have a new theory in communication she also a philosopher, And they delete an Arabic page after many months only fore she is alive person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.131.87.137 (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete - Non notable Peter.C • talk 03:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

yes, that `s right . one of Arabic wiki editors (Mr Obayd) send me an email to tell me that, sorry we can not accept your bibliography until 50 years after your death!(Ghada abdel moneim (talk) 14:02, 27 December 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Your user user page doesn't support your claim I'm afraid. Plus I can't spot a "Mr. Obayd" among other administrators. Rafy talk 02:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It might seem much more sensible if it were a better translation. "smallest Arab woman to serve as" presumably means "First Arab woman..." ; "(brothers Grimm chosen's)" imust mean "selections from the Brothers Grimm" .

I think the more appropriate question is how was she able to translate whole books from English as stated in the article. Rafy talk 02:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• questions

1. It seems not to be true that the arWP in fact does not not accept bios of living people? I note they have 9798 articles in their Category:Living People in Google translation, many of whom are contemporary cultural figures notable for Arab literature, (what was said seems rather like a polite excuse, such as my occasional comment to schoolchildren, "When you are famous someone will write a biography about you" which is not literally the full rule. I notethey do have a page equivalent to Notability(people), Google translation Like here, some of the rules seem contradictory,especially about whether they are to be interpreted as ANDs or as ORs, but their approach to writers is interesting--it does not seem that she has met it. It would seem that any writer they have debated and accepted would meet our notable criteria also. DGG ( talk ) 23:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Being an "almost" native speaker of Arabic I can assure you that those pages don't seem that contradictory at all when read in Arabic. BTW the Arabic version article was deleted four times because of notability issues[1][2] and for being an non-encyclopedic autobiography[3]. Rafy talk 02:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails by WP:AUTHOR, WP:BK, WP:BIO, WP:SPAM, WP:COI, WP:AUTO, WP:SPA, to name a few. Qworty (talk) 23:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. per above --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.