The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gigacity[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nom: PROD contested without improvement. Most of the ghits seem to discuss cities with bandwidth ≥1 GBps or a fictional city in Mega Man X, not the term discussed in the article. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 15:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article is suitable for a dictionary entry, which it already has one. Perhaps in the future things will change, not it is not notable today. --Frmorrison (talk) 17:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete I find one reasonable hit back in 2001, but it's clearly a notion which didn't catch on. The vast majority of book/scholar hits are from scanning errors. Mangoe (talk) 17:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 19:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.