The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Canley (talk) 13:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gilera SMT

[edit]

Apparently non-notable moped. I read Italian, they're not reviews of the product or highlighting any notability. I'd expect far more reviews of a notable moped. There are a handful of reviews in the English and Italian ghits but they're customer driven and no RS coverage. Note the speedy was declined because this is apparently not blatant advertising but I'm not sure what else to call an 'article' that's nothing but product specs for a seemingly nn moped. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 12:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Descriptive article about a distinctive moped model. this sort of subjec is usually considered notable. Article may needs additional refs, but not deletion.DGG (talk) 22:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It should probably stay. Chri$topher —Preceding comment was added at 18:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.