The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:35, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Giorgio A. Tsoukalos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the "aliens guy". The cited sources are a PR bio and a duplicate reference to a single article in his school's magazine. Seriously, this fails WP:GNG by quite a margin. I think a redirect to Ancient Aliens is the best that can be justified here. Guy (Help!) 01:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't keep biographies because they could, if osme theoretical sources were found, become legitimately sourced. Please provide reliable indepdnent sources if you have them. Guy (Help!) 16:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aliens.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 22:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to pass GNG. Jarkeld (talk) 14:53, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with the current references (considering the general lack of good sources), it seems alright to me. --Jonas kork (talk) 13:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions. Joe Roe (talk) 11:56, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.