The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein (talk) 19:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Global marketing strategy in the automobile industry

[edit]

Non-encyclopedic essay. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Dito as CL Czolgolz (talk) 15:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral for now. The article is very US-centric, and definitely needs style changes, but it has references, and the topic doesn't appear to be covered yet. It could be salvaged or possibly merged. It's too soon to tell. The article has only been up for two and a half days. Voceditenore (talk) 16:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yet another of the articles from a school project that isn't interested in working within WP's format. User:Globalecon/Global_Economics LegoTech·(t)·(c) 18:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Strong delete, look like someone "cut-n-pasted" a section out of a college text book. Rob (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article has reliable sources, and I've revamped it a bit to remove the more essayish components. It needs definite expansion to be a great article, but the pieces are here. Karanacs (talk) 20:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've just notified the author of the article. Just because the prof isn't running the project well doesn't mean we should bite the newbies and not even inform them that the articles were nominated for deletion! Karanacs (talk) 20:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing that. You're right, it's not the individual editors' fault. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, though at the very least rename: it's actually about "global marketing strategy" in the US automobile industry. However, I don't believe this topic needs a stand-alone article. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 21:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-encyclopedic essay written as school assignment. --DAJF (talk) 04:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral for now. With a bit of work, this could be made into a respectable stub. If it does not improve soon then it should go. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.130.129.135 (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.