The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Go Solutions Group, Inc.[edit]

Go Solutions Group, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any reliable source coverage of this company; not notable as far as I can tell. Sam Walton (talk) 18:51, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Does not seem to be notable, and I'm surprised it wasn't AfD'd sooner. :) An internet search turned up nothing but trivial entries. As a comment, the page was created and extensively edited by what appears to be a WP:SPI. Johanna^{(talk to me!)} 03:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 04:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 04:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 04:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 04:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Currently consists of nothing to suggest solid notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.