The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close It is indeed impossible to judge all these hotels simultaneously (although I have deleted the obvious spam). I'll renominate the rest separately. Pascal.Tesson 19:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Landmark Hotel

[edit]

I believe that these articles go against WP:NOT#TRAVEL. I can understand Raffles Hotel being on WP, as it is a historic building with heritage listing, but these hotels have limited encyclopaedic value, and do not assert of what importance they are. Russavia 17:13, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they too look like they go against WP:NOT#TRAVEL. None provide any references outside of hotel, opinion, tourist board websites.

Delete. Looks too much like spam, and a three-star rating isn't high enough to make it notable. Clarityfiend 17:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Close - There are far too many varied articles here to be batch AfD'd. Some are major important hotels and some are architecturally notable, ie The Ritz-Carlton Millenia Singapore. These all need to be separate. --Oakshade 17:35, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close and relist separately per above. These articles are far too varying in scope and quality to be bundled into one nomination. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 17:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.