The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:04, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Goophone S5[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Goophones have been making the rounds these days, but I doubt they're notable enough unless if someone would provide enough info/sources to back it up. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There are some sources,such as[1],[2],[3]and[4].But it seems that we can only write a stub based on the given sources.--180.155.72.174 (talk) 07:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Besides the KIRF articles Engadget occasionally posts in regards to faked or knockoff products from China, of course. I'm not that sure if an article about the Goophone line would be worthy of inclusion here, so rather than have it speedied I thought of coming up with this consensus instead. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 01:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 15:50, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:54, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.