Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Welcome to my discussion page. I welcome all sorts of stuff here, rantings, criticisms, etc. But please obey the Wikipedia rules for user talk pages; I don't engage in an edit war or something, nor do I delight in vandalizing, OK?

Here are the rules for my talk page:

• If you start a new discussion here, I'll reply on your talk page or here.
• Please sign by adding ~~~~ at the end of your message when you post here.
• If you're here to complain about what I did, and you're new here to Wikipedia, please, read the rules first. It is likely that the reason why I reverted or revised your edits is either due to POV problems, vandalism or fanboyism; if you're a fan of an actor or actress and you would like to edit their respective articles, please, keep your fanaticism or obsession with your idol(s) to an acceptable level. Asking me to allow you to continue POV-pushing or doing anything else that is contrary to the policy won't do anything good.
• Stay cool; flaming me or others won't do good either.

God Bless, and happy editing! Blake Gripling (talk) 10:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The description you put for the image basically meant that expensive cars meant wealth. For me at least, this sounded very obvious and not particularly unique to the article. Not only that but I felt that there was no need for an image of a car used in the movie because there were links to the articles of the models used. I am sure that the average reader would remember what they would look like before he/she read about the models used in the movie

Hi there, I was the one responsible for multiple editing happened to this page, in some case, why you have to undo the list of awards received by this program. Please it has significance to the page to compliment its quality news programming. It will be a great help to those who are interested to know the awards and recognition received by the program for whatever purpose they want. thanks for your reply. ~~~~

Hello Blakegripling ph this is User_talk:180.190.91.242 are got them trolled and obviously unsorced of Vandalism please help we another revert here

EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding ((subst:Xmas2)) to their talk page with a friendly message.

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feature OS. Since you had some involvement with the Feature OS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. C933103 (talk) 1:49 am, Today (UTC+8)

I saw that you blanked the whole LTA page of him because of WP:DENY rules. I think I'm starting to do the same thing here with WP:LTA/BMX. When I woke up I went to Wikipedia on my phone and saw one of the revisions of my user talk page got edited by the vandal and an admin had to RevDel it all of a sudden. I've seen enough of this troll, so the only options are to request an MFD nomination for that user, or just completely blank on purpose.

I have two questions regarding this matter.
1. What should I do. Is it better that I just blank it or just nominate it through MFD right away?
2. Would it actually help more if I do either of those things?
That's all I wanted to ask. Have a great day. kleshkreikne. T 21:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given the fairly blatant vandalism by BMX I'd say blanking and/or MFDing the LTA page would be more advisable; any such noticeboards seem to serve more to give BMX attention and incentivise them into trolling even further. Blake Gripling (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it's gone now. We all have a few of the most severe cases of LTA's, for example: MRY and SGK. They both will not be as bad this one. This case of LTA has gone off limits now that's it's come to the point where I'm starting to get PTSD because of this. What I've seen from this user has gone too far. Thank you so much, thank God it's gone now. And now I have another question. Would an MFD nomination for his user page and all of his sockpuppets' user pages work, like you did with User:Supreme Genghis Khan work? kleshkreikne. T 22:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It depends I guess. Blake Gripling (talk) 22:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blakegripling ph Wouldn't notcensored conflict with deleting the lta page? 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 03:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have WP:DENY, so... Blake Gripling (talk) 03:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Apparently my page blanking got reverted because it actually hurt more than it helped, the user made death threats to me with an inappropriate username and now because of that, my user talk page got protected for a week. So in my opinion you shouldn’t be too harsh on vandals because this might not help with the vandal either. Before blanking, I think it’s better to form a discussion that meets clear consensus first than do it altogether. See the MRY LTA talk page for further information. kleshkreikne. T 08:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that case bring it to the Wikimedia Legal Department as this is definitely crossing the line and should addressed with swiftly. Even if the user does not actually have a credible intent to harm anyone, any and all death threats should be taken SERIOUSLY. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we should have like an open discussion about the blanking of the LTA pages and how it might help with WP:DENY. See WT:Long-term abuse/My Royal Young for further information. I’m doubtful that it might not be worth it. Apparently we’re also not supposed to courtesy blank LTA pages (per this thread), even if you wanted to do it per deny. It’ll actually gain more recognition to the vandals rather than denying it though. kleshkreikne. T 21:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]