The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gourmand World Cookbook Awards

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. A tag has been on for 8 months and nothing has been added to help prove notability. The only independent source is the BBC one which is about a book that won an award and not the awards themselves. All the other sources are from the winners of this award so absolutely not independent. Domdeparis (talk) 09:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the COI's rationale for keeping the article on Talk:Gourmand World Cookbook Awards isn't convincing either. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.