The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Griffin Guess

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article was deleted in 2007. Still not seeing enough to meet WP:SIGCOV. Edwardx (talk) 11:46, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient coverage to satisfy WP:SIGCOV and subsequently fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 09:00, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Disagree there is significant coverage. But can't figure out why this person is notable? Freetheangels (talk) 02:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

* Comment Disagree, its enough sourcing of verified information. Person is notable music producer, and spouse of famed persons.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Evensteven200 (talk • contribs) strike confirmed sock vote--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:48, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: When sockpuppets are needed to justify keeping, the article might best be deleted. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete carefully crafted WP:artspam. The cites and ref's are superficially misleading. One must delve deeper. None provide sufficient, in depth coverage in reliable sources to meet GNG, ANYBIO, Notability (people). A hodgepodge. And being married to a model is not sufficient for notability.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.