The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm sorry USBallistics but there is a consensus here that this band is not notable at this time. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Habit of Force (band)

[edit]
Habit of Force (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable band. Not signed to any major label, no songs on any national charts - appears to fail WP:BAND. A Google news search only shows one relevant result, and that's a simple listing. Standard search shows the usual array of primary references, user-generated sites, press releases, and social media - little significant coverage from major independent sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.