The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, per Altairisfar's improvements which address the in-depth concerns of the nominator. (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 19:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hangout Music Festival[edit]

Hangout Music Festival (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I dont think that this music event meets the criteria for inclusion, the coverage is not in-depth and significant and does not go behond the Routine coverage. Mtking ^(edits) 23:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - the references added by Altairisfar are enough to meet our notability requirements. LadyofShalott 23:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The coverage is mostly feature length articles and while many sources are regional publications, a few are nation-wide. Altairisfar (talk) 23:19, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 00:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 00:41, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 00:43, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Has in-depth coverage in multiple reliable independent sources. Meets WP:N. —Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 00:51, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as updated article now has sufficient in-depth coverage in reliable third-party sources to cross the verifiability and notability thresholds. - Dravecky (talk) 07:36, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.