The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Black Cats (band). Eddie891 Talk Work 23:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hazhar Saleh[edit]

Hazhar Saleh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP has been vigorously defended by its creator who has been removing tags and objecting to a redirect. After weeks of this the sourcing consists almost entirely of performance clips on YouTube. There’s an interview and the first reference appears to be valid, but there certainly isn’t enough here to support a BLP. I’d be happy with a redirect to his band as an outcome, otherwise there is no basis for keeping this. Mccapra (talk) 19:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 19:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 19:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:21, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's a deletion notice, so if you really do feel that the article is worth keeping, you should comment at the deletion discussion as to why you feel the article should be kept— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talkcontribs)

Please have some respect for our artists.

Thank you. Brave.soul92 (talk) 10:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC) (the above contribution copied from the talk page on behalf of an inexperienced editor) Mccapra (talk) 10:39, 2 April 2021 (UTC) — Brave.soul92 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Evidence is evident. And quite valid On the other hand, slander is definitely not part of Wikipedia's policy. Users who call goodwill fake should be careful what they say. In any case, the article has the conditions to remain and in my opinion it is fully qualified Struck off duplicate vote by Aliasghar ghorbandokht Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 06:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC) [reply]

*keep very famous he show in BBC TV and Avang — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talkcontribs) 21:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC) striking duplicate vote Mccapra (talk) 22:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see only 1 ref. Shadow4dark (talk) 11:37, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*keep I think it would be better to help modify and add the source instead of deleting the article I believe that giving the article a chance can be a good solution.

And also very reliable sources have been added recently. Please remove Tag Thanks Admin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talkcontribs) 22:39, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

striking third attempted !vote by the same editor. Mccapra (talk) 22:54, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.