The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Euryalus (talk) 22:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Salas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks any sustained coverage that would pass the GNG. For example the Washington Post article mentions her name, but that is it. It is about the winner, with nothing than names for the runner ups. John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment She didn't even actually win the Miss USA Nevada Title, she got it after the winner was disabrred for disorderly behavior, so she didn't even win an adult level title.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Again, presuming that winning at the state level is not considered inherently notable, we have nothing more, it appears. Montanabw^(talk) 02:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:33, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:33, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:33, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - While the previous holder of the Miss Nevada USA title which the subject inherited might be notable for the win and subsequent "firing" by Donald Trump, which was extensively covered in the media, this subject apparently is not. Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 17:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as still nothing convincing for an independently notable article. SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.